Laserfiche WebLink
.: 3 <br /> The collector's cash books were footed, the payments to the treasurer <br /> were checked with the treasurerts cash book, the abatements were compared I <br /> with the assessors ' records of abatements granted, the transfers to the <br /> }' tax title account were verified, and the outstanding accounts were listed <br /> k and reconciled with the accountant's ledger controls . <br /> To further' verify the outstanding accounts, notices were sent <br /> e <br /> a. to a large number of persons whose names appeared on the books as owing <br /> money to the town on April 4, 1970. A number of replies claiming payment <br /> i <br /> were received, investigation of which led to the discovery that a number m <br /> ' of checks listed in the count. of cash in the treasurer' s office onj <br /> April 4, 1970 had been deposited without credit having been given to the <br /> ptaxpayers ' accounts . Additional proof of payment was furnished by a <br /> F tyi t <br /> { <br /> 4 number of persons and a total of 48 accounts were credited with payments <br /> 5� <br /> ? aggregating $2,731.97, the outstanding list being adjusted accordingly. k'' " ! <br /> x From the remaining replies it appears that the accounts, as now listed, <br /> are substantially correct. The reconciliation of the cash of the �i� I <br /> collector of taxes shows a discrepancy of $2,746.97 on April 4, 1970, <br /> including $15.00 due for municipal lien certificates issued by the <br /> collector. <br /> x <br /> Again during this audit it appears that in many instances there <br /> `a was a lapse of days or even weeks between the date of the actual payment <br /> �3 <br /> to the collector and the date of the entry of- such payments in the <br /> collector's cash book. Once again the provisions of Section 7, <br /> Chapter 60, General Laws, are called to the attention of the collector. <br /> This statute requires that entry be made in the collectorts cash book <br /> 4.'of such payments "as received" . <br />