Laserfiche WebLink
w <br /> Mashpee School Committee <br /> Restructure Sub-Committee <br /> February 28, 2008 <br /> Minutes <br /> Attendees: Chairman MaryRose Grady, Ralph Marcelli, and Rich Bailey. Also in <br /> attendance were Superintendent of Schools Ann Bradshaw and Business Administrator <br /> Patricia Lugo. <br /> The meeting began at 5:05 p.m. in the Quashnet School Cafeteria. <br /> Mrs. Grady stated that the goal of the meeting is to allow the community to voice <br /> concerns and to form a working committee to investigate restructure. She stated that a <br /> suggestion was made to have approximately 10 people on a working committee, <br /> including administration, staff, parents, and school committee members. Mrs. Grady <br /> stated that communication will be stressed and people will be kept abreast of information. <br /> Mr. Marcelli stated that in his view, the purpose of the restructure committee is to do the <br /> following: <br /> • Investigate if it is economically feasible <br /> • Investigate if it is beneficial to students <br /> Mrs. Bradshaw stated that the question is," Can we use the space we have better?" She <br /> discussed that some of the objectives of the meeting were to share the information that <br /> has already been gathered about space and facilities and to gather more questions to see <br /> what else may need to be looked at. <br /> Ms. Lugo reviewed the facilities report that she and Mr. Tripp put together that <br /> demonstrates how space is utilized in all three buildings. <br /> Mrs. Grady opened the meeting to comments and questions. <br /> There was discussion about what the Committee's thoughts might be as to the location of <br /> Pre-School and Kindergarten for next year. <br /> The Committee stated that no decisions have been made regarding Pre-School and <br /> Kindergarten. <br /> There was discussion that it was hard for parents to voice questions or concerns without <br /> knowing how grades might actually be structured for next year. <br /> Mrs. Grady suggested a possible scenario, for the purposes of discussion, of having one <br /> building of Pre-K to 4, a second building of grades 5-8 and a third building of 9-12. <br />