My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1987 JAN-JUN-ZBA APPEALS
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
1987
>
1987 JAN-JUN-ZBA APPEALS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2016 7:13:33 PM
Creation date
11/17/2016 3:38:07 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
308
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TOWN OF MASHPEE <br /> I 3 BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> TOWN HALL, MASHPEE, MASSACHUSETTS 02649 <br /> DECISION <br /> RE: Petition of Joseph Elovitz for a Variance Case #V-86-12-143 <br /> A Petition was filed by Joseph Elovitz for a Variance for permission to vary the <br /> length of a proposed dock in a R-3M Zoning District on property located on 83 Sumter <br /> Sea Road, New Seabury, Mashpee, Massachusetts. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws <br /> Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in the Falmouth Enterprise, a newspaper <br /> of general circulation in the town of Mashpee on November 26 & December 3, 1986, a <br /> copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> A public hearing was held on the petition at the Mashpee Town Hall on Wednesday, <br /> December 10, 1986 at 3:30 p.m. at which time the following members of the Board of <br /> Appeals were present and acting throughout: William Hanrahan, Michael Makunas and <br /> Cheryl Hawver. <br /> Opposition was voiced from abutters and the Mashpee Shellfish Commission however <br /> the topography in the area was established as being the basis for a legal hardship. <br /> The Board reached the following Finding of Facts: <br /> 1. The topography in the area was established as being the basis for a legal <br /> hardship. <br /> 2. Granting of this Variance was found not to be detrimental to the area or <br /> public good. <br /> Upon motion duly made and seconded the Board of Appeals voted unanimously on <br /> December 10, 1986 to grant the Variance of nine feet as requested with the stipula- <br /> tion Mr. Elovitz comply with the following conditions: <br /> 1. The Pier, Ramp and Float are to be constructed in conformity with the <br /> stamped engineers drawing on file. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.