My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990 JAN-JUN-ZBA APPEALS (2)
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
1990 JAN-JUN-ZBA APPEALS (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/11/2017 4:28:25 AM
Creation date
11/17/2016 3:38:37 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
203
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P. O. BOX 1106 <br /> r MASHPEE. MA 02649 <br /> -3 <br /> BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION <br /> FOR A VARIANCE <br /> A Petition was filed by Forward Development Corporation of <br /> Pittsfield, Massachusetts for a Variance under Section 174-46.E.6.0 <br /> of the Zoning By-laws for permission to vary the sidewalk requirements <br /> in the Quashnet Woods Open Space Incentive Development on property <br /> located in an R-3 zoning district at 765 Falmouth Road (Map 81, Block 1) <br /> Mashpee, Massachusetts. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts <br /> General Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The <br /> Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee <br /> on December 22 and December 29, 1989. <br /> A public hearing was held on the Petition at the Mashpee Town <br /> Hall on Wednesday, January 10, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. at which time the <br /> following members of the Board of Appeals were present and acting <br /> throughout: Cheryl A. Hawver, Michael A. Makunas and William J. <br /> Hanrahan. <br /> Attorney Alexander L. Dittami represented the Applicant. <br /> He informed the Board that the Final Master Site Plan dated <br /> September 20, 1989 had been approved by the Mashpee Planning Board <br /> in conjunction with an OSID permit. The plan called for the <br /> re-alighment of the sidewalk from the side of the roadway to the <br /> front of the buildings in and through the interior of the development. <br /> The proposed sidewalk configuration allowed for a pedestrian pathway <br /> around the entire development. The Planning Board endorsed the <br /> granting of a variance. No comments were received from abutters. <br /> The Board determined that the design as shown and the Variance <br /> requested will not affect the zoning district as the structures on <br /> this lot make it unique to the property. Further, given the density <br /> of the project, the traditional design would have promoted increased <br /> potential for number of pedestrians along the side of the road. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.