Laserfiche WebLink
gTONy <br /> Tofutt of � ttshpee <br /> P. O. BOX 1108 <br /> BLE MASHPEE. MA 02649 <br /> BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION <br /> FOR A VARIANCE <br /> RE: Application of Phyllis P. Thompson for a Variance V-90-01-13 <br /> A Petition was filed by Phyllis P. Thompson for a Variance under <br /> Section 174-31 of the Zoning By-laws for permission to vary the <br /> minimum lot size requirement on a proposed 17 lot subdivision on <br /> property located in an R-5 zoning district at 301 Pimlico Pond <br /> Road (Map 1, Block 1) and 307 Pimlico Pond Road (Map 2, Block 22) <br /> Mashpee, Massachusetts. (Owner of record: George H. and Phyllis P. <br /> Thompson) . <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts <br /> General Laws Chapter 40A. Notice was given by publication in The <br /> Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee <br /> on January 29 and February 5, 1990, a copy of which is attached hereto <br /> and made a part hereof. <br /> A public hearing was helt on the Petition at the Mashpee Town Hll <br /> on Wednesday, February 14, 1990 at 7:30 p.m. at which time the following <br /> members of the Board of Appeals were present and acting throughout: <br /> Michael A. Makunas, William J. Hanrahan and Richard E. Halpern. <br /> Attorney Jonathan Fitch represented the Applicant. He explained <br /> the procedural history of the Petition. Mr. Thompson had filed a <br /> preliminary sub-division plan with the Planning Board on May 6, 1987. <br /> The Planning Board approved the preliminary plan on June 17, 1987 <br /> subject to the realignment of Pimlico Pond Road to eliminate a u—curve. <br /> The preliminary plan was for a 17-lot subdivision and all of the lots <br /> met the 60,000 sf minimum lot size which was the applicable zoning. <br /> Mr. Thompson had been asked to negotiate with the Department of <br /> Public Works and the Town Planner regarding the relocation of Pimlico <br /> Pond Road. The negotiations took approximately one year. When the <br /> plans were resubmitted to the Planning Board the zoning had changed from <br /> 60,000 sf to 80,000 sf and the Planning Board had no alternative but to <br /> deny the plan. <br />