My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1980-1981-ZBA APPEALS - BLACKBOOK
TownOfMashpee
>
Town Clerk
>
Minutes
>
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
1980-1981-ZBA APPEALS - BLACKBOOK
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2016 7:12:14 PM
Creation date
12/19/2016 10:00:51 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TOWN OF MASHPEE <br /> BOARD OF APPEALS <br /> DECISION <br /> iRei Petition of Ockway Bay Development Corporation (72 Gia lane) for a Variance <br /> A Peitition was filed by Ockway Bay Development Corporation for a <br /> Variance under Section 7.4 of the land Space Requirements for permission to <br /> I <br /> vary the minimum lot frontage and minimum lot size requirements, to resub- <br /> divide the land in order to correct lot lines, on property located at 72 Gia " <br /> lane, Ockway Bay, Mashpee, Massachusetts. <br /> Notice was duly given to abutters in accordance with Massachusetts <br /> General laws, Chapter 40A as amended by Cahpter 808 of the Acts of 1975. <br /> Notice was given by publication by publishing in the Falmouth Enterprise, a <br /> newspaper of general circulation in the Town of Mashpee on April 22, 1980 <br /> and May 2, 1980, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. <br /> A public hearing was held on the petition at the Mashpee Town Hall <br /> on Wednesday, May 7, 1980 at 8:15 p.m, at which time the following members of <br /> the Board of Appeals were present and acting throughout: Michael Makunas, <br /> Raymond G. Sweeney, Peter Muse. <br /> Mr. John Slavinsky, representing the Petitioner, explained to the <br /> Board that the development was constructed without any regard to existing lot <br /> lines, and in order to draft a new plan to submit to the Planning Board, the <br /> variance would be required. <br /> The Board established that granting the request for variance, as <br /> presented, would not be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the <br /> ordance or By-law, and would be detrimental to the Town. <br /> Upon motion duly made and seconded, the Board voted unanimously <br /> to deny the request for variance as requested. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.