Laserfiche WebLink
Board of Selectmen <br />Minutes <br />February 22, 2016 <br />APPOINTMENTS & HEARINGS <br />Report of the Waste Management Committee: (continued) <br />Recommendation to Not Implement the PAYT at this time: <br />By a vote of 6-2, the Waste Management Committee recommended the PAYT not be implemented at <br />this time. The Board of Selectmen agreed to revisit this topic for consideration as a ballot referendum. <br />Recommendation to Establish an Enterprise Fund for the Transfer Station:, <br />The Board of Selectmen agreed to further review this recommendation. <br />Recommendation to Continue Education on the Benefits of Recycling: <br />Recommendation to Increase the Signage at the Transfer Station: <br />It was suggested that added signage with bold lettering further define the benefits of recycling and the <br />costs associated to the disposal of waste be incorporated at the Transfer Station site to promote <br />awareness. In addition new initiatives to educate the public, and staff members was recommended to <br />be included in the recycling campaign. <br />Motion made by Selectman Cahalane to continue the Education program, and further develop <br />new methods to educate on the beneFts of recycling including defining costs associated to the <br />disposal of bulky waste. <br />Motion seconded by Selectman Cotton. <br />VOTE: Unanimous. 5-0. <br />Roll Call Vote: <br />Selectman Cahalane, yes Selectman Sherman, yes Selectman Gottlieb, yes <br />Selectman O'Hara, yes Selectman Cotton, yes Opposed, none <br />Recommendation to explore option to maintain a Dual System with Status Ono: Withdrawn: <br />There was not action with respect to this regard. <br />PAYT — Possible Ballot Referendum: <br />Discussion followed with respect to studying this matter for one-year to further define operational <br />costs and savings before re -presenting the PAYT ballot question to the voters. Waste Management <br />Committee member Andrew McKelvey suggested the PAYT be considered as a binding referendum <br />with adequate education prior to putting this decision before the voters. <br />It was agreed the Town would digest this information, and revisit this matter again in early March. <br />