My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/10/2016 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
3/10/2016 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2017 4:11:19 PM
Creation date
3/10/2017 4:11:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/10/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Resource Areas: Bordering Land Subject to Flooding, Buffer Zone to Land Under Water, <br />Peters Pond <br /> <br />Ethan Schaff, representing the condominium owners, explained only half the beach is usable and <br />the second half is all stones. The owners of the condominium contacted PA Landers and were told <br />to get approval from Conservation Commission. He referred to the proposal from PA Landers <br />which was to drive over the asphalt driveway and dump the sand at the edge of the beach. They <br />would not go onto the beach but would kill three hydrangeas which will be replanted. PA Landers <br />will be using washed sand. <br /> <br />The Agent noted the property on the map provided. He said there are standard conditions which <br />need to be demonstrated such as clean washed sand must be used and it should be grain size <br />compatible. He asked if the applicant was asking for a request in perpetuity and the applicant <br />confirmed. The applicant said the sand would be three to four inches deep on the rocks. <br /> <br />No comments from the public <br /> <br />Motion: Bud Shaw moved to Close and Issue, seconded by Dale McKay. Vote unanimous. <br />5-0 <br /> <br />6:03 James M. Gomes, 53 Timberlane Drive. Proposed replacement of dilapidated dock with <br />an aluminum dock. RDA <br /> <br />Resource Area: Inland Bank, Land Under Waterbodies and Water Ways (Santuit Pond) <br /> <br />James Gomes, owner, explained he was looking to replace his dilapidated dock with an aluminum <br />dock in the same footprint as existing dock. The Agent noted the location of the property is on <br />Santuit Pond with a very steep bank. He showed the existing wood dock on a photo which is <br />falling apart. Mr. Gomes had come before the Commission previously for an RDA which expired <br />after three years so he is back before the Commission again to seek a new RDA. Mr. Gomes said <br />this is a request for a seasonal dock and he will have the dock removed seasonally every year. No <br />storage of the dock on the bank itself. <br /> <br />When it comes to small docks and piers and seasonal docks, the plans provided are acceptable for <br />a Chapter 91 license. It doesn’t have to be an engineering plan. Santuit Pond doesn’t fall under <br />Natural Heritage jurisdiction so there are no rare species habitats associated with Santuit Pond. <br />The Agent recommended a Negative Determination. <br /> <br />No comments from the public <br /> <br />Motion: Mr. McKay moved a negative determination, seconded by Mr. Shaw. Vote <br />unanimous 5-0 <br /> <br />6:06 William D. and Carol A. Sherman, 18 Great River Road. Proposed construction of a <br />pier, ramp and float with stairs leading to the new dock structure. NOI <br /> <br />Resource Area: Land Under Ocean, Coastal Banks, Salt Marsh, Land Subject to Coastal <br />Storm Flowage <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.