My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/7/2008 HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Minutes
>
5/7/2008 HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/31/2017 5:23:36 PM
Creation date
9/5/2017 10:38:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/07/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
by the town must be covered but the Commission does not want to make the process so cost <br /> prohibitive that they are discouraged from submitting an application. It is likely that the cost <br /> of review would be absorbed in the contractor's fees. <br /> Non-Residential Project fees are based on square footage. Mr. Fudala utilized the Planning <br /> Board fee structure to determine these fees. <br /> 3. Application and review procedures <br /> Mr. Fudala will discuss the procedures further with the Building Inspector before the next <br /> meeting. <br /> c. The initial application should include 3 copies. <br /> f. The Commission needs to identify a designee or sub committee who can conduct an <br /> initial assessment to determine whether the application needs to be reviewed by the <br /> Historic District Commission. The Commission prefers that the process included two <br /> people to ensure checks and balances. Ms. Adams indicated that in many communities, <br /> this would be the responsibility of a Town Hall staff person, for example a Town <br /> Planner. Ms. Adams will investigate further. <br /> Mr. Robbins indicated that he would be willing to fulfill this role,with Mr.Picard as the <br /> second member. <br /> g. The Commission discussed whether or not an applicant could move forward with the <br /> project if it was determined that the work does not involve exterior architectural features. <br /> It was agreed that the applicant can be told but the By-laws are written such that the <br /> - e <br /> Commission must issue the Certificate of Non Applicability before the work can begin. <br /> Mr. Fudala requested that the Commission review the remainder of the Draft and email him with <br /> any additional changes. The Draft should be complete after the next meeting so that it can be <br /> shared with the public, allowing the application process to begin in July. <br /> I4 Next meeting will be scheduled for Wednesday, May 21 at 4:30 p.m. <br /> Motion made by the Chair to adjourn. Motion seconded by Mr.Mills and all voted <br /> unanimously. <br /> Meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. <br /> Respectfully submitted, <br /> 0' � <br /> Je� � er Clifford <br /> B d Secretary <br /> 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.