Laserfiche WebLink
Mike Ball, Marsh Matters, represented the applicant. He described the project as <br /> a single family house, 4 bedrooms. It is an undeveloped lot which abuts the <br /> Quashnet River. They have not received a response as of yet from Natural <br /> Heritage. The house and the septic system have been pushed to the front of the <br /> lot (away from the resource areas) as far as possible. He noted between the lot <br /> between the proposal and the river is a fairway on the Quashnet Valley Golf <br /> Course. The Agent asked about roof runoff capture and asked this be shown on <br /> the plan. He asked about the staking and asked that work limit stakes are put in <br /> the field. He asked that the landscape details be shown on the plan. An <br /> alternative analysis has been conducted. What is being proposed will not cause <br /> any adverse affects to the river. Application for the septic has been submitted to <br /> the Board ofeN alth arid-is under review. <br /> No comments from the public <br /> Motion: Mr. Shaw moved to Close and Issue pending the submission of a <br /> revised plan, seconded by Mr. Rogers. Vote unanimous 4-4 <br /> 6. 15 Barbara Botello, Trustee, 91 Bayshore Drive. Proposed construction <br /> of single-family Dome NO[ <br /> Resource Area; Buffer zone to top of coastal bank, LSCSF and salt <br /> marshlBVW <br /> Mike Ball, Marsh Matters, represented the applicant. The proposed project is a <br /> single family home, four bedrooms. This project is proposing an option of a patio <br /> and pool. When they market the property this option will be up to the property <br /> owner. The Agent said the landscaping and drywell locations should be shown <br /> on the plan. Board of Health application has been submitted and under review. <br /> The Agent asked that the areas of the lot seaward is to remain undisturbed and <br /> asked this be shown on the plan. There is no adverse impact to the salt marsh or <br /> BVW. It is a fully vegetated, non-eroding coastal bank. There was a discussion <br /> on tree removal and the Agent said that is why he needs a landscape plan and <br /> the trees should be noted on the plan. Mr. Ball would note this on the plan. The <br /> Agent reiterated that the drywells, marking of trees that will remain and <br /> landscape details should be noted on the plan and anything outside of the work <br /> limit shall remain naturally vegetated. <br /> No comments from the public. <br /> Motion: Mr. Shaw moved to Close and Issue pending the submission of a <br /> revised plan, seconded by Mr. Rogers. Vote unanimous 4-0 <br /> There was a discussion regarding the trees in the patio/pool area and to request <br /> that these trees remain in place until the pool is installed. <br /> 4 <br />