5/11/2016 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Minutes

Home Browse Search

N Town of Mashpee 16 Cir eat ek. AoadArorlh `SAD �u " Mashpee, Nas&aehusots 02649 MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MAY 11, 2016 MINUTES The Mashpee Zoning Board of Appeals held Public Hearings on Wednesday, May 11, 2016, at 6:00 p.m. in the Waquoit Room at the Mashpee Town Hall, 16 Great Neck Road North. Board Members Jonathan D. Furbush, William A. Blaisdell, Dom DeBarros, Scott Goldstein, and Associate Members, Brad Pittsley and Norman J. Gould were present. Board Member, Ron Bonvie was absent. PLEGE OF ALLEGIANCE NEW HEARINGS 341 Great Neck Road North: Owner, Leonard Mendes requests a Variance under §174- 31 of the Zoning By-laws for relief from lot size requirements to deein lot buildable on property located in an R-5 Zoning District, (Map 60 Parcel 60-13-0-R), Mashpee, MA. Chairman Furbush addressed the audience stating that he was stepping down from the first hearing. Board Member, Dom DeBarros said that he was also stepping down from the first hearing. Chairman Furbush told the first applicant that there would only be four (4) board members voting on his petition, and that the petition would require a positive vote from all four members in order for the petition to pass. Chairman Furbush said that all applicants have a right to request a continuance with five (5) Board Members present, or he could move forward with the presentation with only four (4) members present. Mr. Blaisdell asked Mr. Mendes if he understood his choices to present his petition. Mr. Mendes said he would move forward with his petition. Mr. Mendes presented a plot plan that was hand -drawn by L. T. Hammond, dated September 11, 1953. It depicted three lots; Lot #2, Lot #3, and Lot #4. Mr. Mendes owns Lot #3. He said that both Lot #2 and Lot #4 were owned by different families and did not appear to be held in ownership together. He believes he can he granted relief by the Zoning requirement. Mr. Gould read an email from Tom Fudala, Town Planner dated May 5, 2016 into the record regarding Variances. It basically states that unless and applicant can meet all three (3) Variance criterion, than Variances should not be granted. Mr. Blaisdell read the Inspection Department comments dated May 4, 2016 into the record, and the Board of Health comments into the record.