|
MASHPEE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
<br />AUGUST 10, 2016
<br />MINUTES
<br />3. A House Plan: Titled: Proposed Addition/Renovations, Semple Residence, 43
<br />Sakonnet Dr., Mashpee, MA. Prepared by: SPB Designs, Residential Design,
<br />Drafting & Consulting, PO Box 1441 Easton, MA, 508-2388338, Scale 1/4" =1'
<br />0", Date: 5/512016, Drawn by: PAB, Revisions: (blank), Drawing Number: Al
<br />Front Elevation, Left Elevation, Right Elevation, A2, Proposed First Floor, and
<br />Rear Elevation, A-3, Foundation Plan, Floor Framing Plan, A-4, Roof Framing
<br />Plan.
<br />4. This is also conditioned on all department comments that were read into the record.
<br />Mr. Goldstein, seconded the motion. Mr. Furbush, yes, Mr. Blaisdell, yes, Mr. Goldstein,
<br />yes, Mr. DeBarros, yes, and Mr. Pittsley, yes. All were in favor of the proposed house
<br />renovations and additions.
<br />16 Pa nomett Road: Owner, Kathleen J. MacRoberts requests a Special Permit under
<br />§174-45.4 of the Zoning By-laws to allow for construction of an accessory apartment on
<br />property located in an R-5 Zoning District, (Map 61 Parcel 46), Mashpee, MA.
<br />Mr. Joseph Butler, the builder for the prof ect, represented the homeowner who is proposing
<br />to install an accessory apartment. He provided a hand -drawn layout of the house as it
<br />currently stands, and a plot plan that depicts the proposed addition. The current house is' a
<br />two bedroom, and the addition will consist of 528'square feet, with a bedroom, bathroom,
<br />living space and kitchen. I
<br />Mr. Furbush read the Building Inspector's comments into the record dated August 4, 2016
<br />basically stating that it does not meet the requirements as stated in the Town Bylaws.
<br />f
<br />i
<br />Mr. Furbush read the comments into the record from the Conservation Department; "no
<br />comments". He also read the Board of Health comments into the record basically stating
<br />that the plan depicts fourbedrooms, and the septic system only has a capacity to hold three
<br />bedrooms and will need to be upgraded to the required capacity. Mr. Furbush said that the
<br />drawings need to be revised.
<br />Mr. Goldstein asked if there is a wall separating the den and office on the first floor. He
<br />said that the office looks like a bedroom, but should be revised with a 6 ft. opening to
<br />satisfy the Board of Health.
<br />Mr. Furbush suggested to the applicant that he continue the hearing until September 14,
<br />2016 to provide the revised plans to depict the bylaw requirements and as stated in the
<br />Building Commissioner's comments i.e., the accessory apartment needs to be not less than
<br />the 300 square feet, nor more than 40% of the gross floor space, and needs to be attached
<br />to the existing home.
<br />Mr. Goldstein said that the revised plot plan needs to include all the calculations, especially
<br />the lot coverage.
<br />
|