Laserfiche WebLink
a volleyball court. The Agent informed him that it would be unlikely that the Commission <br />would allow a volleyball court in this area as it would be considered a structure and thus, <br />prohibited under the regulations. The Agent claimed that the association was aware of <br />this wetland area and that it was under the jurisdiction of the Conservation Commission by <br />virtue of the association president inquiring about allowable activities in this area. <br />8 <br />Attorney Brodsky said the Association's intent is to continue to use the area for <br />recreational activities with the understanding that any future changes require Commission <br />approval. They are proposing to remove the (planted) weeping willows because they are <br />not native to the area. <br />The Agent said the outcome he is looking for is that this area be certified as a wetland and <br />no further mowing or alteration be allowed in this area. He has been in contact with town <br />counsel regarding this matter and is awaiting feedback. The Agent stated he also has <br />correspondence from the same association member who reported the mowing activity <br />which showed evidence of alteration to the wetland (creation of a drainage ditch) and also <br />email correspondence from one of the association members who claimed that the <br />association is trying to "fill" the wetland. The Agent said he could supply this information <br />to Attorney Brodsky. Based on the photos showing evidence of alteration coupled with the <br />email correspondence from association members indicating that they are trying to "fill" the <br />wetland, the Agent is concerned about the future usage of this area for recreational <br />purposes. He said he believes that the continuation of mowing the wetlands will result in <br />subsequent cumulative adverse impacts to this documented wetland resource area. <br />Public Comment. <br />There were some comments from the association members stating the mowing and <br />recreational activities have taken place since the 1970s. <br />In conclusion, all parties agreed to table the discussion of this matter and reconvene at <br />the hearing on March 12f" to allow time for town counsel feedback. <br />Motion: Mr. McKay moved to table this hearing until March 12, 2015 seconded by <br />Mr. Sweet. Vote unanimous 5-0 <br />Review proposed Chapter 172 By-law changes for May Town Meeting <br />The Agent gave an update on the proposed wording changes to the Ch. 172 Mashpee <br />Wetland Bylaw for the upcoming May town meeting. The Agent reviewed the proposed <br />wording changes to the Commissioners and advised them to provide any feedback they <br />may have. The Bylaw changes have been submitted for the May town meeting warrant <br />but there is still time for editing, feedback, etc. <br />Suggestions on Chapter 172 Regulatory language (Regs. 1-33) <br />The Agent recommended that the Commissioners review the Ch. 172 regulations for <br />updating. He stated that any changes to the Ch. 172 regulations (not the Bylaw) would <br />require advertisement in a local newspaper and a public hearing. Once changes are <br />formalized and public comment has taken place, then any proposed changes may be <br />promulgated at a public hearing of the Conservation Commission. <br />