Laserfiche WebLink
2 <br />Dan Wells, Goddard Consulting, represented the applicant along with Mike Coutu from <br />Sudbury Design Group. As requested by the Commission at the hearing on January 8, <br />2015, the applicant reviewed the approved project mitigation plan at the time when the <br />house was originally constructed. After reviewing the plan, it was determined that all <br />mitigation plantings for that project were to be installed within the coastal bank and that <br />the proposed project will not alter any mitigation plantings from the house construction <br />project. <br />Mr. Wells explained the modifications that Sudbury Design Group made to the plan. The <br />proposed wood terrace and pool were relocated two feet toward the house and away from <br />the coastal bank resource area. The pool is 8 feet from the house foundation. this <br />change allows for an additional area of mitigation plantings in the buffer zone adjacent to <br />the top of the coastal bank. The proposed fence has been moved further up the coastal <br />bank and will be adjusted during installation to minimize disturbance to any vegetation. <br />The plan is proposed to transplant any existing native plants to minimize disturbance to <br />existing vegetation. <br />The Agent reiterated the resources areas. He said what is being proposed in the areas of <br />coastal dune and land subject to coastal storm flow is entirely a resource area <br />enhancement (mitigation plantings). A fence will be installed on the coastal bank and will <br />not result in any alteration of the coastal bank. There will be no adverse effect to any of <br />the resource areas. The Agent stated the project is not going to affect any of the <br />performance standards. The Agent recommended a Close and Issue. <br />No comments from the public. <br />Motion: Mr. Sweet moved to Close and Issue with the understanding that the <br />mitigation plan will be submitted prior to the signing of the permit, seconded by Mr. <br />Shaw. Vote unanimous. 5-0 <br />6:03 Gregory Bush, 55 Santuit Lane. Proposed septic system upgrade. Applicant <br />requests continuance to February 26, 2015. Needs more time to submit plans. RDA <br />Motion: Mr. Shaw moved to continue the hearing at the request of the applicant <br />until February 26, 2015 @ 6:03 p.m., seconded by Mr. Shaw. Vote unanimous 5-0. <br />6:06 Valentin P. Gapontsev, 15 Ocean Bluff Drive. Proposed construction of elevated <br />boardwalk and stairs and mitigation plantings. Applicant requests withdrawal without <br />prejudice. NOI <br />Motion: Mr. Sweet moved to allow applicant to Withdraw without Prejudice. <br />Seconded by Mr. Rogers. Vote unanimous 5-0. <br />6:09 Joseph L. Sullivan, 17 Bearse Road. Proposed septic system upgrade. RDA <br />Resource Area. UCSF. <br />Peter T. McEntee, PE, Engineering Works, Inc. was representing the applicants. He <br />explained the work will consist of locating, pumping and filling or removing the existing <br />