My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/9/2015 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
4/9/2015 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2018 10:55:57 AM
Creation date
1/10/2018 12:54:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/09/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6:09 Donald E. and Milica G. Pogorzelski, <br />constructionlinstaliation of patio, walkway, <br />Continued from 3126115. NO[ <br />4 Waterline North Drive. Proposed <br />pool, landscaping and hardscaping. <br />Resource Area: Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage, Coastal Bank, Salt Marsh, <br />Bordering Vegetated Wetland, Land Under the Ocean (Jehu Pond), and Area of <br />Critical Environmental Concern <br />Matt Costa, Cape and Islands Engineering, represented the applicants. Mr. Costa <br />explained they have reduced the pool shed size, saved two trees originally proposed to be <br />removed and added two mitigation trees to compensate for the trees that are proposed to <br />be removed. They relocated the pool and increased the proposed buffer between the top <br />of the coastal bank and the edge of the patio. This is all a previously disturbed area and <br />will end up with an increase in the natural vegetated buffer strip. They reworked their <br />mitigation calculations and modified the narrative to include that. Part of the required <br />mitigation includes shellfish seeds in the waters of Jehu Pond under the direction of Rick <br />York, Shellfish Constable. They ended up with a project that improved the overall site <br />conditions from what exists today. They will end up with an increased natural vegetated <br />buffer area and increase natural vegetation throughout the site. In addition, through the <br />shellfish seed they will improve the water quality. Mr. Costa said in his estimation there will <br />bean_over.all_environmental -irnpr_ovement. to -the. site. -This meets_the_performance-standards_._.-_.......- <br />and he respectfully requested the Order of Conditions be issued. <br />Following a brief discussion, the Agent stated he has reviewed the revised plan which <br />increased the setback of the proposed pool/patio from the top of the coastal bank with <br />increased plant mitigation. The number of trees to be removed has been reduced. He said <br />the project meets the performance standards. In addition, the Agent said he likes the idea <br />of having the shellfish seed as mitigation. He said the shellfish mitigation is a really good <br />idea for situations where upland mitigation is restricted due to site conditions. It is <br />something that works well for the resource areas and for Rick York's shellfish program as <br />well. He recommended to Close and Issue. <br />Motion: Mr. Shaw moved to Close and Issue, Mr. Rogers seconded the motion. Vote <br />unanimous. 4-0 <br />6:12 Robert L. and Denis L. Archila, 12 Pine Ridge Road130, 32, and 36 Monomoscoy <br />Road. Proposed demolition of existing structure and construction of new dwelling. <br />RDA <br />Resource Area: AE Flood Zone, Salt Marsh <br />Darren Meyer, Meyer and Sons, represented the applicant. He said the existing dwelling <br />has 3 bedrooms and fully compliant with Title 5 Septic System. The property is partially in <br />an AE Flood Zone and there are no wetlands within 100' of the property. Mr. Meyer <br />explained the project is to raze the existing dwelling and to build a new dwelling and garage <br />and no work will be conducted within 100' of the wetlands. The garage will be built at a later <br />date. He reviewed the plan with the Commissioners. The Agent noted the construction of <br />the house is outside of the flood zone and noted this is a legally established lot. There are <br />no performance standards for the buffer zone to flood zone. It meets the performance <br />standards for land subject to coastal storm flow. The Agent recommended a Negative <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.