Laserfiche WebLink
r , <br /> Board of Managers <br /> Upper Cape Regional Transfer Station <br /> Meeting Minutes <br /> April 13, 2016 at 10:45 a.m. <br /> Mashpee Town Hall <br /> Mashpee: Catherine Laurent, Chairman <br /> Falmouth: Ray Jack <br /> Sandwich: Paul Tilton <br /> Bourne: Dan Barrett,Phil Goddard (alt.) <br /> Otis: Chris Segura <br /> Present: Chairman Catherine Laurent, Paul Tilton, Ray Jack, Dan Barrett, Phil Goddard <br /> Also Present: Mike Scipione&Mike Richard—Weston& Sampson; Carter Hunt— <br /> MassDevelopment; Sharon Rooney—Cape Cod Commission; Dave Quinn—DEP; Cavossa, <br /> Gregg Crowley—Cavossa Disposal Corporation; Shawn Delude—Nauset Disposal <br /> Absent: Chris Segura, <br /> CALL TO ORDER <br /> The meeting was opened by Chairman Laurent at 10:55 a.m. with a quorum. <br /> NEW BUSINESS <br /> Approve Minutes of February 2016 Meeting <br /> MOTION: Mr. Jack made a motion to approve the minutes with the amended date of <br /> February 22 as they reference January but reflect the February 22" meeting. Mr. Tilton <br /> seconded the motion. All voted unanimously. <br /> Discussion of Potential Bourne Conflict of Interest <br /> The Chair inquired whether Mr. Barrett had consulted with his Town Counsel regarding a <br /> potential conflict of interest. Bourne's Counsel responded that they felt it was not a conflict of <br /> interest in the true definition. Mr. Barrett stated that it was more of a technicality and read for <br /> the record the referenced law Mass General Laws 26880, Bourne will be meeting to discuss the <br /> issue further but intends to apply with their proposal at the same time as the RFP process, rather <br /> than as a private contractor in the RFP process. A meeting has been scheduled for next <br /> Thursday. <br /> Review of Draft RFP for Re-Use of the UCRTS for Issuance <br /> Mr. Richard of Weston& Sampson summarized a PowerPoint presentation to discuss the RFP. <br /> Mr. Richard indicated that the RFP had been set up to follow Chapter 30B procurement <br /> providing two envelopes from each proposer, one for a non-price proposal and the second a price <br /> proposal. 1t would also allow the negotiation of contract terms and conditions. The consultants <br /> drafted the RFP to be consistent with the feasibility report. <br /> Among the important terms would be a 5 year contract with an option to extend, the Board <br /> would be able to terminate if something were to happen with the property, the Board would <br /> maintain the right to access the site and the contractor would maintain the property and <br /> 1 <br />