Laserfiche WebLink
Motion: Mr. Sweet Moved a negative determination, seconded by Mr. <br /> McKay. Note unanimous 5-0 <br /> 6:05 A. Westerling Investments, LLC, 688 Great Neck Road South. Proposed <br /> installation of privacy fence and plantings. RDA <br /> Resource Area: Flood Zone <br /> Austin Westerling explained he was requesting to install a privacy fence about <br /> 220' long and 7' high. The purpose is to increase front yard safety for his 3 young <br /> children and dog as well as to reduce road noise from Great Neck Road South. <br /> The fence would only cover part of the front yard and not be fully enclosed. The <br /> goal is to maintain as much of the existing vegetation as possible and also plant 4 <br /> more evergreens in the front yard. The property has been staked by Cape and <br /> Island Engineering. The Agent recommended a negative determination. <br /> No comment from the public <br /> Motion: Mr. Sweet moved a negative determination, seconded by Mr. <br /> Rogers. Vote unanimous 5-0 <br /> 6:09 William E. Baker, 100 Wheeler Road and 96 Wheeler Road. Proposed <br /> removal of hazardous trees. Owner of record of 96 Wheeler Road. John R. <br /> Baker. Continued from 10/22/2015 meeting, RDA <br /> Resource Area: Buffer zone to inland bank (Ashumet Pond) <br /> James Connelly, Connelly Tree Service, represented the applicant. He explained <br /> the project was to remove several trees. He reviewed several dead pines and oak <br /> trees to be removed along with 8 to 10 branches, suckers. The Agent noted <br /> sucker growth and branches to be removed for a view is another process and the <br /> applicant would have to come back to the commission for pruning for a view. This <br /> is a separate permitting process. <br /> The Agent reviewed the trees and branches on the photos to be removed. It was <br /> determined that on lot 5717, 3 trees to be removed one bordering the house and <br /> the driveway and on lot 5718, 2 trees to be removed. As far as the other 3 trees <br /> they should be left off for another time when the shed is to be built. He said he <br /> would schedule a site visit with the homeowners for clarification and <br /> recommended a negative determination. <br /> No public comments <br /> Motion: Mr. Sweet moved a negative determination, seconded by Mr. <br /> Rogers. Vote unanimous 5-0 <br />