Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Conservation Cor i slon <br /> October 14, 1993 <br /> Page 3. <br /> as to whether the stairs could be of concrete, rather -than wood, locked into the <br /> stones. If wooden, they might need to .pull up the stairs in case storm. <br /> The purpose here tonight is to build the stair back for easier access across the <br /> riprp that is there, <br /> Nis Lannik asked if it rri ht be possible to use the same -type of stone to create. <br /> the stairs as was wed for the 1prap <br /> Mr. Taylor stated a dry solution would be difficult as they lost all the fines. <br /> Stones there are not indigenous to- the area, are not perfectly in order and <br /> there are all types of surfaces to lock oto. The question is whether they <br /> can make them out of something more substantive than wood. <br /> Mr. Sherman felt the stairs should be wooden, they are disposable. <br /> Mrs. Ferriday asked if it would be conditioned that they could take them out <br /> with a call to the Commi <br /> s io Mr. Shemin stated if it can be designed that <br /> they can be done that way it's not a problem. <br /> . Taylor suggested a landing at the top with a binge that can be rem.owed t <br /> pull them and then put a. guard across the top rail. <br /> �. Sherman suggested issuing an Order of Conditions contingent upon the Building <br /> Inspector's approval of the methodology of removal of the stags. <br /> Public conments were requested: <br /> Thelma Kanter stated they were hoping to get stone stairs but she could see that <br /> was not feasible. <br /> Stanley Kanter suggested making the stairs so that when pulled up they could b <br /> put across the 6 feet and locked into the fence already there. <br /> It was noted that the DEP number is Missing, also notice to the Wetlands <br /> Conservancy and abutter notification receipts. <br /> Motion made and seconded to dose pending receipt of notice to the wetlands <br /> Conservancy, DEP number, and receipts of abutter notification and condition <br /> that the building inspector must approve construction methodology for the <br /> stairs. <br /> CLOSED <br /> 7:30 JOEL A. KANTER for a Detemination of Applicabilityn the licensing of an <br /> existingiprap and groins t 94 Seco .s t Point toad. Dave Sanicki presenting. <br /> He offered pictures of the foyer Barnes property, purchased of late by Mr. Kanter. <br /> 'There is a Mata license for portions of the work and also the wood ramp. They <br /> are seeking to perm the remain_i,.n portion. No maintenance is proposed now. <br /> It is all in the flood zone. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated a Negative DeterIjL'Mtion could be issued with the condition <br /> that future repairs will be the subject of a Notice of Intent. If it was entirely <br /> built in 1963, a Negative Determination would have to be issued anyway, <br /> Mr. Sanicki stated there is no way to document this. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated it should be conditioned that maintenance in perpetuity <br /> does not go with. the pert. <br />