1/30/1992 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

01 SEE CONSERVATION COMM SIO 12 low leetsOf Ainiary 30., 1992 Com i :.overs Present: Harry. B srosiers, Gertrude Sui nuns, Kathleen errio, Susana Larvik, John Flt mons. Mr. Fitzsimons was declared voting member. . E UI NS • Boundary for Isolated Wetland: State language to be added as to how calculated. 'OTE: Motion made and seconded to nurror the state regulations for calculating the area of ars Isolated Wetland. Unanimous Vote. Administrative Review: Simplified filings for minor projects. Mrs. Simmons asked i f the word "cert1fied" in #5 could be deleted and was told 1 t i in the regulations. In #10, the words "sono tubes' were omitted. She wanted the contractor to also sign off that he has read the entire packet and that the Commission be notified, in writing, when work is completed. 4 Steven Ball asked, regarding relief from notification of abutters, what would prevent someone from putting up a fence while his neighbor is gone? Mr. Shuman advised it ;7 would still require newspaper notice. i Gerald Schulze stated the Commission is based on the environmental, not zoning, and asked how notification would affect the environmental aspect. Mr. Sherman stated ars abutter may be able to point out some envirorffnental aspect not thought of by the Com)nission. Also, it is hoped if it is easier and less costly, _. people would be more inclined to file. VOTE: Motion made and seconded to add the wording that a signature be required for sign-off on the Administrative Review under #27 that they have read and understood the packet and if a contractor is used, that he also has read and understood. Una=* i ous Vote. Zoning Bylaw - re 50 foot setback.- To be included as part of the submittal package. Language revision by Susana Lamik was reviewed,, At the suggestion of 'down Counsel, a written opinion from an attorney would be required certifying exemption from .the law. Ms Lannik advised an engineer could not rake this certification, by law it must e made by an attorney. Anthony Florentini was not in favor of certification by ars attorney; this would impose a financial hardship. VOTE: Motion made and seconded .to accept #7 and b with revisions made by .. Susana La=*k. Unan ous Note. Gape Cod Commission Checklist. In the upcoming months they will have an affect on projects, not single family homes, mainly developments. Revisions by Susana. Lanni � were reviewed. It was agreed to ask that if subject to Cape Cod Commission jurisdiction, the Conservation Comriussion will request a duplication of what is submitted to the CCC. It was noted Conservation cannot proceed while a project is before CCC. VOTE: Motion made and seconded that the revisions made with regard to the status of projects submitted to CCC be accepted.