6/18/1992 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conservation Commission r June 18, 1992 Page 8. Mr. Sherman stated the deck is the only issue, structurally, It had to be done as an amended order. 1t does not go any closer but it is different than what was orig- inally presented. The owners Ed not -know the deck was built without a permit and it has been taken out. Nothing has changed square footage-wise. Mr. Tarabelli showed pictures of the abutting properties and their decks. Mr. Sherman stated it is very flat until you get to the dune; there are no threats i of erosion there. Public comments were requested: i WILLIAM FERGUSON.- e pointed to the deck constructed and advised he sent a letter on June 9 requesting that a tree that was removed at the corner of the easement be replaced. It was ahealthy tree that was removed and . hould be replaced; it does, add decor to the property. He would respectfully request that the Beach Plum tree be replaced. Ir. Sherman stated they cannot be compelled to do this. Mr. Tarabelli advised the projection on the rear of the structure requiring a foundation and excavation got into the roots of the tree. Mrs. Solomon, who was present for the hearing, stated she had absolutely no objections to some replacement of the tree. Mr. Sherman suggested conditioning something not that sizeable. Mr. Tarabelli agreed to submit something through their landscape architect. Mr. Ferguson asked if the grass areas will be replanted when project is completed. Mrs. Solomon stated everything there will go back. Vim: Motion rade and seconded to amend the Order of Conditions as requested. AS REq 9:15 ROBERT J. DEPIEMI to permit and maintain the existing 22 foot extension of an eating permitted pier system at 5 Keel Way. Susan .Amus presenti-ng.. Mr. Sherman advised a Certificate of Compliance was requested and the structure was 22 feet longer than permitted, Shellfish has no problem with the addition. He did not feel there were any adverse impacts and it could be approved with the added condition that they cannot attach the boat lift without a filing. It can be closed pending whether this should go back before the Board of Appeals. It was originally built in 1984 and there is no record of Zoning Board of Appeals. It was noted there are now two floats, Ms Asmus advised `the boat using the structure is a 21 foot 10 with a draft of two feet down, one foot u . Mr. Sherman stated there has been prop dredging for years. Ms Lannik stated if out back, it will be in shallow water. MS mus advised the applicant has agreed to reduce the float to 41 x ' 'an ' x 201 on the outside, giving 200 s.f. total.. She will put this in writing. g