My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/25/1992 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
6/25/1992 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2018 5:10:06 PM
Creation date
1/26/2018 11:34:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/25/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br /> w <br /> I a <br /> Conservation Commission <br /> .dune 25, 1992 <br /> Page 12. <br /> t ri property on Tide Run. They were putting in landscaping timbers with <br /> no Orders of Conditions, He suggested they be allowed to file an After-The-Fact <br /> RDA. They were to come in to the office the next day and did not. <br /> It was agreed a fine will be issued to the landscaper, as well as Mr. McGoldrick. <br /> Skogstrom; Landscape walls' were put in that were not part of the plan or order of <br /> Conditions. Mr. Skogstrom stalled and stalled, then finally said he was going to <br /> file and asked for nares of consultants. In a conversation with Sabatia, he stated <br /> e is going to take the Commission to court and beat them. He is a lawyer. <br /> Consensus of the Cor fission is that he file a Notice of Intent within ten days or <br /> $300 per day fine be initiated. A letter to be delivered to Mr. Skogstrom by the <br /> Constable. <br /> Jonas/Oakley: Illegal d d p=9 t is on the land of Jonas. Enforcement order was <br /> ratified. <br /> POLICY: It is a seasonal dock which was not repaired under the emergency <br /> reqs after the hurricane He began work on it this spring and had not yet applied <br /> for amnesty. It became an enforcement situation. <br /> i <br /> Suggestion was made that, if eligible for amnesty, they be allowed to do this without <br /> n engineered plan. <br /> Mr. Sherman suggested adding two elements <br /> I. that additional proof of existence under amnesty be required, and <br /> 2. that it must have been in exp:stense on January 1, 1984 but require two types <br /> of proof, only one of which can be an affadavit, ie. tax bill, photo, or , <br /> something else. i <br /> It was agreed the burden of 'proof is on them and the determination of eli 'b' 't <br /> is up to the Commission, on a case by case basis. <br /> Mr. Homeyer suggested purchasing a set of aerials for the Commission, pre-1984, <br /> with money from the Conservation Fund. <br /> r.. Sherman requested the Commission set a policy for the time being until he <br /> can pursue obtaining the 1984 aerials. <br /> Motion made and seconded that Commission ' <br /> de the adopt the policy cons , <br /> dock repair that a filing for amnesty be initiated and satisfactory roof <br /> .be provided to the Commi <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.