Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> July 16, 1992 <br /> Page 10. <br /> was told by the Board of Appeals that she should not apply until approval is received from <br /> Conservation <br /> Shellfish input will be requested. it was noted the plan did not have a PE stamp. <br /> Mrs. Mandalos advised they paid for this service. They were not on copies provided <br /> to the Commission. <br /> There was discussion of the charges by engineering firms and what has transpired in this <br /> particular project. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the salt marsh mut be delineated; elevations and details must b <br /> provided. He reiterated, necessary items are the DEP number and comments, details of <br /> the fees that would depend on whether' the revetment would be allowed . <br /> Mrs. Mandalos asked if they would have any recourse? Mr. Sherman stated they would have <br /> to appeal the decision and take it up with the state. He told them to call him and he will <br /> work with them. He advised the top of bank should be shown on the plan. If they are going <br /> for the revetment, the Commi <br />