My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/16/1992 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
7/16/1992 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2018 5:11:57 PM
Creation date
1/26/2018 11:37:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/16/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Conservation Commission <br /> July 1 , 1992 <br /> Public Hearing - Page 5. <br /> clear large areas. It is important to maintain a natural strip of vegetation between <br /> people and the water. This is to have something substantive. State law allows the <br /> Commission to make assessments. <br /> Mr. Sherman advised the Commission wi 11 take further written comments if the public <br /> wishes to provide thea. <br /> Alteration of a total. of 5000 or-more square feet of any naturaUy vegetated area in <br /> LSCSF on a lot, with the exception of the construction of a single family home shall be <br /> presumed to have unacceptable significant or cumulative effects. upon the protectlon o <br /> wildlife habitat. The burden of proof is on the applicant to prove it is not. <br /> For single family domes, the Commission would ask in some oases that with home construction, <br /> or additions, if it is feasible that vegetation be replaced in another area on the lot to <br /> compensate. The -Commission is asking to maintain, if feasible, some natural buffer strip <br /> of vegetation paralleling the shoreline. <br /> Unless no feasible alternative exists, 50% of the indigenous vegetation on the lot shall <br /> e left in its natural state. A path to the beach would not be precluded. vista pruning <br /> should be done under the guidance of an arborist. <br /> It is asking that all structures be s cured. Prevention of stem damage is mandated; the <br /> Commission is trying to be more specific. <br /> Under 3b, alterations, such as impervious driveways could evert storm surges. The <br /> Commission wants to look to see if storm damage will be rade worse. <br /> Mr. Sherman concluded his sunn.ary. <br /> oments by Monomoscoy Improvement Trust <br /> Jim Hanks stated the wording of this implied rede ` nJtion of the coastal storm flowage, <br /> Mr.. Sherman advised there is no change in the ,jurisdiction. It Is 11 feet in most <br /> places; it is the statistical 100 year storm. <br /> Conery asked if only the portion in the flood zone or the whole lot. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated 100 feet from the defined boundary is where the 100 year storm stops. <br /> Jim Hanks advised concern is that since all of Monomosc y is below 11 feet, if anyone <br /> wants to cut a twig, they would have to have Conservation approval. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated this is not true. Cutting for vista ping is allowed; the Commission <br /> wants to know what is being done. <br /> Richard Halpern stated the whole island of Monom se y will be subject to this. Anybody <br /> on Monomoscoy doing any alteration t ,their house would have to do this. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated if the area is already disturbed and is 300 feet from the water, it is <br /> not an issue. The part under 2A and 2B only refers to naturally vegetated areas. <br /> Richard Halpern stated under C 1A, if anyone has a pent to alter, they will have to <br /> provide this plan. <br /> . The Commission's concern is wild.li e; they should include human beings as well. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.