Laserfiche WebLink
w onservation Comission <br /> January 17, 1991 <br /> Page 12. <br /> rot ke: Glen Wood of McGregor, & Doliner said, in no uncertain teras, he defended <br /> the action, defended the material on site as an environmental attorney. Mr, Grotzke <br /> does not wish to get into a legal situation with these people. He was disappointed <br /> the last two meetings were postponed. They have not been willing to date to sit down <br /> face to face to discuss the issue. <br /> Mr. Coffey stated he was under the impression sieve analysis was part of beach nourish- <br /> rent and referring to the letter from BSC stated this does not mention that at all. <br /> Mr. Grotzke stated it was for that particular site only. Sieve analysis is for once <br /> every loco yards. <br /> Mr. Coffey asked if the material for the breach is the same as used for the beach <br /> nourishment and was told it is, exactly. <br /> Mr. Homeyer stated it was not fine like the dune. He asked if they took a core t <br /> sae what the underlayment was? <br /> Ir. tarot ke advised they did coring.in the area. it is wind blown sand but if you <br /> o deeper, it is compatible with that material. <br /> Mr. Homeyer asked at what depth they reached the compatible material? 1t was estimate <br /> to be at least six Feet, if not more. <br /> 14r. Sherman spoke with Jim O'Conner. of CZM who felt there probably should have been <br /> sieve analysis before it was put down but was not. He suggested that a sieve anal- <br /> ysis be part of the Certificate of Compliance but he had suggested to Mr. Grotke <br /> to have it done now. He felt since Glen wood has appealed the RDA, it is likely he <br /> will appeal thi <br />