Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> January 17, 1991 <br /> Page 14, <br /> WEEKLY ITS: Mr. Sherman did not foresee the necessity at this time; there may <br /> be in the future. He suggested meeting earlier some evenings for submittal require- <br /> mets and upgrading the Begs. <br /> WOOD DUCK NESTS: Supplies were discussed for Rene F udala's project, <br /> WILD LIFE HABITAT: A subcommi t t ea consisting of Mr.. Sherman, Mr.' York and Mrs. F udala <br /> are to meet within the next month. <br /> RANT DE i I : Legislation received from Rep. Cahir.. Ability to go onto land with- <br /> out the owner's permission is no stronger than it was. DEP assessment of the decision <br /> was received; to be copied for distribution at the next hearing date. <br /> CUUMVATION RESTRICTION PROGRAM: Board of Assessors to be consulted with to 3-nitiate <br /> a program. Commission to meet for discussion January 24 at 6:30 p.m. <br /> BOARD OF APPEAM Bal A variance being sought from the o ft. setback requirement g <br /> for an isolated wetland and vegetated wetland. Mir. Sherman suggested he revegetate <br /> with indigenous species and there be no alterations from that corner of the douse , <br /> to the wetland, <br /> Mr. Desrosiers stated the house could be rotated. <br /> It was agreed policy should be on a case by ease basis. <br /> Consensus; Go down to variance, leave it natural or go back to natural. <br /> Mr. Sherman advised he had scheduled two conflicting workshops for tomorrow. <br /> . Coffey agreed to attend the Habitat Protection workshop in Brewster. <br /> ENFORCEMENT ISSUES: <br /> DeLuca: Vote: Motion rade and seconded to ratify and confirm an enforcement order <br /> for failure to comply. Unanimous Vote. <br /> Rosenberg: Vote: Motion made and seconded to ratify and confi m an enforcement order <br /> for cutting of vegetation contrary to the order of conditions. <br /> Unanimous Vote. <br /> McMenaty: Arrest warrant has been issued, <br /> Note: Motion made and seconded to do everything applicable to bring this <br /> roan to justice. To be pursued with Chief Frere <br /> Unanimous Vote. <br /> STAMP REQUIREMENT: Town Counsel advised a site plan for a house should have both <br /> stamps and accepting a PE stamp for New Seabury. It was noted the commission has <br /> been accepting drainage calcs from All Cape Surrey Consultants who do not have this, <br /> Town Counsel stated the commission should be more careful with stamps. <br /> Submittal requirements should address this. <br /> .mix poul : An Order of Conditions did not include activity where two cinder- <br /> block walls were created within 5 feet of the top of the coastal bark and e c - <br /> tion done. Dr. Zafiropoulos called and Mr. Sherman felt he is innocent. Fie will <br /> file. Mr. Sherman questioned whether plans should be redone by Cape & Islands <br /> with a stamp. In his opinion the contractor is at fault, <br /> is Lamik advised the property owner is responsible. <br />