Laserfiche WebLink
x <br /> Conservation Commission <br /> January 17, 1991 <br /> Page 8. <br /> Mr. Sherman advised the boundaries of the vernal pool in question are prescribed in the <br /> regulations, not addressed in the superseding determination, gust that it is a vernal <br /> pool. He read the directive from Town Counsel. <br /> Mr. Coffey asked if it is appropriate to incorporate boundaries? <br /> Mr. Sherman did not believe s but will check with Town Counsel. He asked if Mr. Grotzke <br /> would be willing to wait and was told he would. He read again from the letter and stated <br /> the only thing being agreed to is that this is Isolated Land Subject to Flooding, bound- <br /> aries are not part of i . <br /> Mr. Coffey stated if a down-sidO., he would like to know. He feels this whole process <br /> was to define what the resources are and as clearly as possible to define where they <br /> are. If that is the last item and a- question for contention, it might be useful to <br /> pursue it. <br /> Mr. Grotzke stated as this much effort has been expended, it would be helpful to have <br /> an opin�.on from Town Counsel, At that time, it can be determined what the values of <br /> the vernal pool will be to have 1t on record. <br /> s. Fudala did not feel it was necessary. <br /> . Sherman felt it inadvisable at this time, If getting into boundaries of the vernal <br /> of and having Mr. tarot ke in to do another presentation, it should be a public hearing. <br /> f anything finite, it right as well be mother RDA on the boundaries of the vernal pool. <br /> Lannik agreed it is a separate issue. <br /> rotke. tated. if not to define boundaries, everyone w:.11 agree this is the boundary � <br /> f the Isolated Land Subject to Flooding, the heavy dark lune on the plan. <br /> . Sherman pointed out the regulations state at the point there is a specific project <br /> roposed in this area, the Isolated Land Subject to Flooding boundary is basad on observed <br /> ecords and if people don't agree, then you go to the calcs. The calcs have never been <br /> orral.ly presented. fir. Grotzke stated they have, as part of the Hayes presentation. <br /> Sherman stated Mr. tarot ke had disagreed with the Hayes calculations. <br /> . rotke stated he wanted to be very accurate in this instance. In general he does <br /> of think it makes a big difference.' Hayes just used straight line interpolation which <br /> S not accurate when these contours are. . . <br /> . Sherman stated he and Mr. Grotzke carne in at the same time, in the middle of this, <br /> pointed to a lime on the drawing and asked if it is the boundary of the ditch that <br /> rcumscribes the old bog or the boundary according to Hayes Engineering Calcs of the <br /> o year flood. <br /> . tarot ke advised that line by Mayes calculations, is the 6.3 Foot contour, which they <br /> nate to the 1�.t of the Isolated Land Subject to Flooding and elevation shown as con- <br /> dered by calcs as the 8.2 foot elevation. <br /> Sherman stated he has done some preliminary calcs of the boundary of the vernal <br /> of based on the 2.6 inch event. fir. Grotzke stated he did both, Ir. Sherman stated <br /> riots not think the comnussion is being asked to accept that 2.60 Mr. Crot ke stated <br /> was not. Mr. Sherman asked if he was asking that it be accepted as the boundary for <br /> e isolated Land subject to flooding? ir. Grotzke stated that was right. Mr. Sherman <br /> It Town Counsel should be consulted because boundaries are never mentioned in the <br /> perseding de endnati n. He felt the major issue between the commission and New <br /> abury at one point was was whether or not this was Isolated land subject to flooding <br /> bordering vegetated wetland. <br />