My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/24/1991 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
1/24/1991 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2018 5:02:13 PM
Creation date
1/26/2018 11:47:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/24/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
t <br /> Conservation Coffmdssion <br /> January 24, 1991 <br /> Page 8. <br /> RAE SPECIES- POOLS: There is a need for local. regulations. There is nothing <br /> on rare species. Mr. Sherman suggested a rare species habitat zone with strict per- <br /> formance standards, <br /> L : If in an ACEC, the Commussion is not bound to consider it a <br /> 13*M*ted project. <br /> ENFORCEMM ISS[ ES; <br /> Proulx: A letter was sent requiring, removal or filing of a redesigned new dock. <br /> DEP has stated new sections can be denied. Take away the new sections and it would <br /> have gaps making it worthless to Mr. Proul . <br /> Mr. Homeyer suggested the Harbormaster be brought into this as it is a potential <br /> hazard. <br /> VM: Motion made and seconded if no response from. Mr. Pro lx within n a week, an <br /> Enforcement Order is to be seat with a deadline for responding. ; <br /> Dominic F'ranchi: A letter was sent stating he must give the Commssion notice <br /> of his intentions. There has been no response. Mr. Sherman suggested an Enforce- <br /> ment Order to the Attorney. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to sena an Enforcment Order requesting a response <br /> by a date certain to Mr. Franch].t s attorney. <br /> ASS C E ; Its. Simmons felt it would be disadvantageous for Mr. Grot ke <br /> to serge as he would no longer be able to confer with the Agent on New Seab <br /> g � ury <br /> projects because of Conflict of Interest. It would also leave the Comnission <br /> without an associate for most of what would be expected to be seen for Bufflehead <br /> Bay. <br /> r. Homeyer pointed out Mr. Grouke did offer free consultation., <br /> Mr. Desroiers suggested a letter be written to Mr. Grotzke to advise him he would <br /> be f more value to the board and leave himself more latitude in his dealings with <br /> New Seabury and the board as a consul.tont. <br /> The Agent will discuss the points raised with Town Counsel. <br /> i MIC ' ; <br /> `OTE: Motion rade and seconded to accept the minutes of December 2 , 1990 <br /> and January 10, 1991, as written. Unanimous Vote. <br /> APPS PEI : Mrs. Simons recommended that the article for establishing the <br /> time period for appeal be resubmitted. <br /> OONSERVATION RES M CT ON PROGRAM: A copy has been provided to Dave Bailer of the <br /> Assessors Office. A joint meeting to be held for discussion. <br /> It was suggested to prioritize; weigh each one and find out whether worthwhile. <br /> Location, size and teras will have to be decided. <br /> Restrictions are deemed appropriate when they afford protection to the additional <br /> natural resources: <br /> 1 Significant geological areas: hollows, kettleholes, marine scarps, hilltops, <br /> steep slopes <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.