Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> April 4, I91 <br /> Page 3. <br /> YORK: I was there, <br /> PULSONE; I have been there also, Agar there was heavy rain and there was water <br /> and again, it lasted about 4 - 5 days and then goes away. Thegr ass is turning <br /> greener inside the+middle of where the pipe is. The duck pond here, I take objection <br /> to that, it's mentioned here in two paragraphs to DEP v .] <br /> Pa , g en times,, bus he way the <br /> literature is here, ani I have some of the things highlighted, this is from <br /> member <br /> of the board to DEP, Let's have them cone out, look at the site, and make a-r <br /> e yew, <br /> I can sena you literature that stags that when there's two swales DEP doesn't see <br /> them as connected, it's independent. a are taking issue on that too and I think <br /> instead of me spending any more money with' Le i to or anyone else,se, I don1t foresee <br /> it, you obviously hired someone else that Lelito's conclusion wasn'tin <br /> good. <br /> to be <br /> any g g <br /> S : No, this was an independent study of a different nature. <br /> P MO E: How many independent studies do we need? Let's go back a little bit e <br /> Kaci one person who because of economic conditions has roved out Richardson <br /> then <br /> we had the Howland study, We had the Wilson study from the other lot we have <br /> the <br /> .hack Landers-Cauley study. These two lots have more studies than anybody else i <br /> town. Lot 50, across the street, how many studies were done on that? That t s closer <br /> to the pond, as far as 'm concerned. <br /> S : Perhaps we can move ahead best by y saying, with yourpermission, <br /> Chaian ty the <br /> Chairman), re right, this has been studied lot. It is not n easituation <br /> sy . <br /> It's Complicated legally and regulatory-Na'se. We do not have confidence ' <br /> � some of <br /> the studies, that's why we asked for more. It is in t be recommendation <br /> the Board, without going � ion o <br /> beating around the bush, that this is Bordering ve <br /> etated Wetland <br /> and it has vernal pool capacities.. lie wouldn't agree on my interpretations <br /> but it <br /> would be cavy recommendation to the Board that we declare it a Positive D <br /> eterrrnation <br /> because we believe it is the resource areas we put forth. It is our ' <br /> p i � right thea to <br /> appeal ,it, The appeal isn't going to b quick because it is connected legally <br /> regulatory-wise to <br /> � and <br /> -wise t that other appeal which is in adjudication right now but u <br /> y decision. <br /> are correct, eventually, DEP will issue deci � y <br /> If at some point you go ahead with your proposed project, let's� sa for <br /> that DEP agreed � � instance <br /> gr with u or stuck t their origi <br />