My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/6/1991 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
6/6/1991 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2018 5:12:20 PM
Creation date
1/26/2018 11:55:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/06/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Conservation Commission <br /> June 6, 1991 <br /> 'age 18. <br /> HAYE : amain, remember the only thing we're talking about is the connecting ramp, <br /> everything else is perm t ted, <br /> COSTA: Does the ramp cause a problem to the environment' <br /> HOI YER: The whole entire structure is creating a problem. <br /> COSTA: Well, I mean, does the neighbor's dock with his 88 foot boat cause damage <br /> to the environment?? <br /> sROSIERS: He is not here tonight to represent himself and I won't rule on that. <br /> COSTA: I'm not asking you to rule on it. <br /> sR TRS I wasn't here when anyone was asked to rule on the float or l think l <br /> would have spoken up thea.. I'm -speaking tonight because this is what is before me <br /> and l do not feel that I, as a member of the Conservation corrdssion, wish to see <br /> this permitted and create more damage to the environment and shellfish,, <br /> COSTA: Does the gangway cause damage to the enviroment? <br /> sR sly: It doesn't at this time, it is not permitted, <br /> COSTA: Would the gangway which is going from one structure to another, not touching <br /> water.', . . . . <br /> COFFEY: I'm going to draw this to a close. We actually have a motion on the table <br /> and seconded and the discussion is straying from the motion. The actual discussion <br /> item on this pending vote is, "'do we amend the vote to a denial w7li,thout prejudice' <br /> (HON=: Moved and seconded). And that is the current discussion, to rove the <br /> question, do we vote this one? All i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.