12/12/1979 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

f` r• �5- Charlest I would suggest a continuance until we get both plans. Paul ine t Wer should we do that. We can act on this, Charles t Okay. I uncle stood that you were going to refile so that the both could be put together. Pauline: No. Two separate notices. Charles t As this house is 78# the deck would be a minimum of 78? Bruce: 73 harles t coning from the same point, 3 If you take it from here it would b approximately the same distance. Wa. rye t I think it is about the only place you could put i . Bruce: I had no choice. I have a minimum building line that I have to Ballow that i recorded in the deed. Pauline: Does that call for a variance from the building inspector? �i No, he is within t5 Feet. Bruce: I followed evier, hing to theletter as far as this went. Now if you wanted tell me that you wanted it -way back here, then I would have to go to get a variance. Charles: Did they give you a reason for building line's -Brucei It i - recorded in the deed. Ithink this building line wasn't Just for this lot, I believe., Barbarat It looks like an arc of a. circl. e. P ul ine Yes. That is a cul-de-sac, Bruce t I don't think it keeps going in the arc. a ne: It probably is. Most set-backs are like 30 feet. It probably is because of the narrow frontage on the cul-de-sac. They want you to set it back around the cul--de sacs as opposed to the streets themselves. Pauline: In different zones, they have over 100 foot frontage. Bruces Flus it would be difficult if they didn't have that and people were required to have 20 feet away g you would be forced to build a long narrow house in order to fit in your 15 feet side requirements. , Pauline: Also, there is something I am trying to find out. If your house goes up a certain number offeet, it is required more footage on each side of your lot. I saw it in the building code and I wonder if it is a state building code. I don't know whether it pertains to Mashpee.