My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/9/1981 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
9/9/1981 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2018 5:30:08 PM
Creation date
1/30/2018 2:13:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/09/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
wetee1t frust Hearin cont. Paye 2 <br /> 2.4 feet, That does vary, At times: of course, in the spring tide you get a -- <br /> ble that you could get a tide a i:;rcaching 4 feet. So the top of this pier, at <br /> elevation would be. about 21 lfet above normal tide range. <br /> Wayne: Is the overall new additional length, "Ir. Braman, 120 feet? <br /> i r. Braman d es, � sol id pi er is 120 feet and the ramp s 12 Feet and the <br /> float i : x 20 feet. So it would be 14-8 feet from the stairs which we would <br /> construct. Those stairs would cover five to six feet from where that -pier that <br /> is there now ends. <br /> 4 <br /> Charlie: Asks for a profile of the additions, <br /> Mr. Braman: Do you mean how the house is going to look? <br /> Charlie: Yes. But perhaps it is immaterial at this time because this has n6thing <br /> to do with the expansions of the house at this time. <br /> Mr. Braman: we are applying for anything within 100 feet of the high water mark, <br /> Paul-ine: The Notice of Intent has nothing about a house, just the pier, <br /> r. Braman: Shows the Board plats of the house prepared by the architect, Tells <br /> the Board that he is not the architect. This will show you what he proposes to <br /> do. <br /> Pauline: The architect has the mean high on the drawing different than on the <br /> site drawing. Questions the dif ' rene of the scale on the drawings., <br /> 'firKob i Asks why the plea is so close to the neighboring lot. There is <br /> no dist.,ance at all. The abutter would have a hard time getting into his lot. <br /> Pauline: Who is the abutter? <br /> Mr. Braman: The abutter is Michael and .Regina Jay. <br /> Mr. Koblins y: According to the k=, y Corps of E .ginee s plans, you would be right <br /> on the abutter's line. That would be in no way fair to the abutter if he tried to <br /> build his own dock. 1 cannot see anybody building a dock right on the line. <br /> a. r e; Is there � setback for ��hat <br /> _ <br /> Mr. KoblinsA legal setback, i don't know. 1 would have to look it up in the <br /> Army corps of Engineers rulings. 1 do not have the ruling here but, automatically, <br /> that should be voted against on that one basis. The other thing that 1 question i <br /> the depth shown, Asks Mr. Braman where he got the depths fr•o .that he has listed? <br /> Mr. Braman; We are taking these elevations from bench marks which are already <br /> established in the area. The bench mars have been established by the coast rid <br /> geodetic survey, We are simply tra.nsfe=ing those from the established mark. <br /> Mr. :K-obl in Is that right that you have only got 1.3 Feet at mean low water? <br /> 'fir. Braman: At mean low water# you would have 1. 3 feet* <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.