My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/9/1981 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
9/9/1981 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2018 5:30:08 PM
Creation date
1/30/2018 2:13:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/09/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br /> art <br /> .ieetie Realty "frust fiearingont, <br /> X, ., oli .nd er: T I ive there I would 1 ov o have tie water that he has t sere <br /> in front of my place. <br /> ;firBra-Ran These nu,wrber re resent actual elevations of the ground. It starts <br /> here and it gets deeper. I am not say-Ing that it gets a. y deepe ' than � feet. <br /> `fir* Krob1.ins We have never questionned these figures here on any chart. But <br /> we were just wondering about the :jean low water and the depths, You are taking <br /> these from a bench mark. l was just wondering how long ago these depths were <br /> measured. since then they have changed a lot due to the hurricanes and every. <br /> thing else in there. These are not actual measurements which you have .a.de your <br /> self this year, are they? <br /> r, rama-n q These numbers are actual numbers o but they are based on the geodetic <br /> determination of mean low water as being zero. Those were all established in <br /> or 1930* <br /> !-:a.rl ie: This is going t effectively shut the beach to all walking, ; n't it? <br /> r <br /> Braman: Yes, This did this when it extended. It doesn't do it now, of <br /> course. Shows where a section would be only 1 foot above the beach and suggests <br /> that they could eliminate any rails in that section so that people -calking could <br /> cross over* Or we could even put stairs on either side, <br /> Mr. obl in s In town, we are proposing to limit the length of d oc s to feet. <br /> How much harm would it d your case, if you moved that back to 45 feet? That <br /> would mean cutting cut 15 feeta <br /> 'fir. Braman: Those sections are 12 Feet apart. If we moved it back two 12-foot <br /> sections* that would be kind of tight, If we were to br4in g this back 15 feet, l <br /> don tt think that there would be any obJection and move the configuration of the <br /> float so that ,the edge of the float would be in line with the southeasterly lin <br /> of the dock that would give us 12 Feet to the property linet <br /> : o ander: I would still ob ec t to it because it is way t far out, <br /> � r. Braman: May I point out that s imply from a Conservation point of view, that <br /> objection is not valid, <br /> Pauline: All objections have to be put in writing. We will take this underad- <br /> visement. The Board will do an on-site inspection. <br /> 00 P.M. Hearing <br /> Elizabeth Flton <br /> 00 Summer Sea Road, Mashpe <br /> Ao,entor Bruce Fulton <br /> ED <br /> Pauline: Reeds Public Hearing Notice -- to build and malntai.n a dodo, ramp and <br /> f 1oa.t at 100 'E34-mmer Sea Road, .a.shilee on Jckway Bay in accordance with glans on <br /> file. would you please present t h i s t 'fir. -Fulton? <br /> nice Fulton: This has approximately t 0 f e-e t of marsh V.nat we have to go over <br /> before we can reach the water. At low tide, the area is all mud flats. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.