10/14/1981 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

/r 1 F`I O 1p a#R 13 1v1EH= V OC "POB 1981 ch P.r■1, e luck! ,r . Leri ` Dur;:Ler f - S h irley Nadelman The eetir was called to order at D.m. Other ,people Present during the meeti- were,, ',- John Landers- a.uley of Li and a-'a h, David M. Smith Thomas Smith of Monomoscoy Road, Bruce Fulton and ism. '01i .rwis . Charlie requested that a memorandum be sent to tie Board of health requesting that they require on all septic plans of areas within the ,jurisdiction f the Wetlands Act the use of "Proposal on itgGround Water Levels on Cape Cod As Developed By the USGS." (memo seat 10/17/81) The _-S' etary was asked to send a letter to 11111r. & Mrs. Glass request-ino::)- ars answer to otff letter of Ji-me , 1981 infor� � the Commission as t he loca- tion of their doc'-'k and to advise us what the DEQF, number assigned was when the dock was built. - They were also told in the letter that the Conservation C -.. � iss*on has determined that the cranberry bog and perimeter around Fells Pored is agricultural land. (letter sent 10//19/81 Z-,.20 He . of Manuel ulickman of 7 Pond Circle was continued duo to no representation. Thearin was re-schedule . for November 4, 1981. Z:40 Hear David Smith of Lets X74. 4'75, 476 Monomoscoy Rd. -- Agent: John Laneiers-Cauley- of Holm,.=_,s and McGrath The public wearing _notice i read -- to construct and maintain a 72t reinforced concrete bulkhead, to raze the boat seed, to fill, rrade and loan and seed the landward side of the bulkhead and disturbed areas at Lots 474, 475 and 476 no osc y Rd. within 100 feet of Great River. John La.,. er-C Holmes and 1"Zc rath: The lot is a. -L.-roxi ately 75 feet wide, and 120 feelk. deep. It has an existin house and existincr shed and an existing boat shed. What we would like to do is protect the shore that abuts Great Kiger. Shows the Board where Mr. Smith is experiencing erosion, Shows where the boat is moored. He has two pil-.n s to steady the boat. Low - a,l r is shown �.- approximately o.6 feet fete. Asps why they are using concrete for the bulkhead versus wood? John Lance- a.0 el designed the wall but am not sere who decided on using concrete. Ec nomi a_11r, a timber structure would be better but would re uire more maintenance* However, l do not see anyting wrong with using concrete, fan't concrete lef-7:Lch into the r irer? John La, der-Cawley: No matter what shore front protection you are going to have you will ha.va some side e l ect. If us il n wood, I would want omell.-.h ing which pro=.fid Dr'eser e the 'good. I have not seen any documentation 'that ordinary concrete is d e t,-,-e L}en ta.l,