My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/7/1982 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
4/7/1982 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2018 5:20:30 PM
Creation date
1/30/2018 2:25:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
04/07/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Conservation Commission <br /> " i . 1 ? Page 6 <br /> 1n..t es� A <br /> �, e:ll .naton Oilfield "upply hearing, cont. <br /> Mr Og ren States that he believes that relates to a. proposal to use some mind, of <br /> stabilization on the bluff and not to the construction of the cottages. ILe also states <br /> that he does not know of anything which states that they didn't want any tense ofper- <br /> manence lent to the cottages themselves. This whole area has been under Paul And r on's <br /> review since day one. (Paul Anderson is a, Regional nvironmenta.l Engine 3r-� �`: om D 4 <br /> 'there are a. number of letters on file relative to the septic systems and t.heir changes. <br /> At no time did anyone indicate that these cotta.;es cannot stay there. lr. Fact, these <br /> people have,' under a condominium form ofownership, purchased the right -.la.ve the <br /> cottage there. They mere also deeded an additional right to move it back If they so <br /> chose. He does not think anything which has come out of MILIA has said they have <br /> to move ;them 'b .ck..at -this time or that they can't ,jack them up. Stated it was a. <br /> suggestion that came out of -Paul Anderson's office about moving the cott ,c., back. <br /> Peter,: Asks where they world move the cottage if they were going to move ilt. back? <br /> Mr. 2aren. Where is an easement which has already been deeded to each coot.11,e owner on <br /> the bluff, (Points out the area for the cottage in question) States thy.L. �e asked the <br /> Client if he wanted .to consider moving it bask and he said "ono". This atr~tic��lar in- <br /> d fvidu .l who has purchased this unit is one who has rented down in Mau ho; Village for <br /> number of ye .rs' a.nd he was not concerned about the erosion. He felt that .e would cross <br /> that bridge when he came to it. if he builds it on sono tube, he can move i fairly <br /> readily. It is riot like putting it on a full foundation. That is what the request is. <br /> Charlie:_. Asked if the footings for the proposed additions would be on sone: tubes? <br /> Mr. en: s eta.tes ' tha.t they will be on sono tubes- as well. t a.t es that t l-,e proposed <br /> additions are indicated. He points out that it will involve a. bathroom area, a. bedroom <br /> area and a storage area. <br /> Peter: Asks if it will continue to be -just a summer residence or a. year-round residence? <br /> Mr. Ogren „ States that t'o his knowledge, it will continue to be just a. summer~ residence.' <br /> States that Mr. Coller~an resides in Rhode Island. <br /> Ch�.rlie: - Asks if.- the outdoor shower w 111 be hooked -up" <br /> Ir. ren: States. tha.t there has been no indication that it would- be. It would be a. <br /> matter -of hnving 1t on sono tubes. <br /> Charlie: States that- it cannot comply with Board of Health regulations. You cannot take <br /> a- drainage from a toilet facility of any type and introduce it' upon the surface, It must <br /> go to a septic system. - The shower can be used with soap. <br /> Mr. Oar n: It can -be used with soap, that is true., but that is not the primary reason <br /> .* w Oar <br /> a� <br /> for this outside shower. There .was talk about the units not having aninside shower so <br /> that.a. person had to shower outside, <br /> Charlie: Suggests that he check with the Board of Health, <br /> Mr. Ogren:, states that when the units were reapproved as far as the changes were con- <br /> cerned' i the condominium plan the outside shower did show. In each case, it was de- <br /> signed such that everybody would have the opportunity to annex this little area, on so <br /> that they could build a real legitimate bathroom inside the house. The way hese units. <br /> are now, they have a. vanity, a, sink and a. toilet inside and the shower was outside and <br /> no matter what' you wanted in terms of a. shower, it had to be outside. The thing that <br /> dict not comply was the fact that there was no inside shower. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.