Laserfiche WebLink
cons ervattlo i ion ' s <br /> minutes o:: 7 ly 7 , 1982 Page 1 <br /> E -16 , cont. <br /> Mr. iesi er cont. <br /> where the gash is noir down to thea. He commented that those were things <br /> which are visable in areas where he feels are wetland areas. He Stated <br /> that it is not agriculu al any more once you start fi�llnq - in for a crolf <br /> course v a condominium r development as it then becomes developed land. <br /> He stated that there are severe problems with the pond .currlentl and- that : <br /> they are concerned over- the i nab.- result. and the .impacts that it will have. <br /> He stated. that their concern was the stream and the preservation of it as <br /> a fisheries. <br /> Mr.' i a : �ornme ted that if' the stream has been -stopped, 'that they had, <br /> noth req to do with it as it was done b - the 'ia e iece - om an r. stated� -, <br /> that the same problems arose back in 1974 and that it was determined by <br /> the <br /> Gv r inq bodies at that time that the pro-*ect would not harm the area. <br /> The overall open space for development is 51 percent. r The- Conservation <br /> commission, Board of Appeals and Plannina Board felt that this particular <br /> develo ent -o ld'-hot harm the river or anything else and they allowed u <br /> . to do thi& , <br /> ttty ,_.�. .a Stated that he felt that -1 t was very unfair- to say that <br /> mx. Umina is not making a consertive effort to maintain the river4,, <br /> Mr-. hnenbercre * Asked if the commission has a record of how many viola- -.` - <br /> tions <br /> iol -.` .tions that they- cited Mrs Umina- fob' since 1974? <br /> oroth Studle stated that - the -Commission did have records and that she <br /> lie e that Mirg Umi na was stopped onde back in 1975. She commented that <br /> another item in the Order of conditions that a list of chemicals being used _ <br /> be reported to the conservation commi sic.n was not done part of the time. . <br /> r. #: orient d t a - ,t .o ut the India suit, there- was no money' = <br /> t and ver little fertilizer was put on the property which they reported s: . <br /> each year - <br /> Dorothy tudle : Also mentioned- ,that a certificate from a biologist was'.. ' <br /> ara.F../.�.�••fir, ...q....«I�LFlI <br /> not submitted to the Commission.' <br /> Mr,, Ui a: stated that in 1981, r. ' c . , a biolo "st and former member;. <br /> of <br /> the conservation ori sion, inspected the whole- area and approved it. <br /> Dorothy. Studle ommented that the commission had only received the one <br /> report since 1974 frbm -a ' certified. trained biologist.'.. r <br /> . . . tt . Turco: Pointed- out that they were - here tonight for two issues <br /> one being. r the 100 and the other being the matter -of the springs. <br /> Dorothy .commented that they might as well get it all aired out' <br /> now. <br /> Mr. ohenber er: stated that for,, Tilden granted the Mashpee Conservation <br /> ommission to decide whether or not they considered those particular bodies <br /> of ,rater tributaries. <br />