7/7/1982 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

r Conservation Commission ' s i. ;rtes of July 7 , 1982 image IE,24 3-1 , , cont. Mr. ina * Replied that it is not evidence. - It is hearsay. Atty,. _ w r : '} people- havesaid the mmi .that. they .have see They have id there � � ewe � . there and that it can only - ro -,;. on where there � . fresh water . iowin' g. He continued to say that he. is not- saying that theConservation- Commission should shut you. down forever. ' What I am saying s that enoucrh evidence has been heard by the- Commission' and if thi's Commission wants t'o investi- gate Further, I think that, the appropriate exercise of. their power would , . r warrant further nvesit a.tion. . A whole new-. set of Facts are. being ad- dressed hee which were not addressed in- 1974, tt . Turco: Stated that - they are talkinq about a question of fact and a question of law. i t,, L Asked if the Commission had any say over- ahoy. int ways:l broth Studley: Replied "no Pauline Decor Stated that the- Planning Board would. I��_. Stated that there was one duty up -there aand it is gone. = Dorothy Studley : Asked if anyone else had anythi q to say, r. �n b � Ask. + hast the Commis ion p .a d. o: o. y = oroth Stu ley : said that the Commission.' could take it under advisement and- have r. mina stake - out the area . o. that it. could be viewers by the.. a. Conservation mml sxo ., = EL fir. - i s : ec_uested -to take a- plan with -thea. o that they could give it, to the surveyor to. us.e. This request was-,- granted) tty,. Reardon.*. At this point, he e plained. .the statute of the- wetlands act to those that did not understand it. F r Dorothy ley: stated that the Order of o ii res- was prepared wi' the help of an attorney, fir.. ohnenb er:. State' that he- would -like to make e i-t a - record that he., { has been -in violation at," least 7 or 8 times as -he- did not submit a biolog LIst report, He read eonditioh . 3-, - e as} ed the 'Commis ion how many report, were re elved±. .. . . Dorothy tudle : t ated that the Cor misa''o r.ece�ved one biologist' report tt 'ur o: Asked if- the ommission took into consideration - the fact that .ev ryth n��ad been stopped through n"o, h� i . .df.=.thy..' eloper. t � u i . j. Stated that the fact: till-- ema i s that a good al:_o . the golf course went ahead without the necessary forms being submitted to the Commission, tt o .Tur o: stated that he believed that in some of the -years , there was corn-binec.1report tati ng,-that ono i-n -was done.