My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/21/1982 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
7/21/1982 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2018 5:27:30 PM
Creation date
1/30/2018 2:36:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/21/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
of Jaz ='l, �982 Pag e 2 <br /> Atty. Reardon stated that one of the points -which was raised two weeks agot which <br /> is still ars issue, is the fact on the orifi-.nawi submission the ditches are ' wetlands <br /> and the Conservation Commission has no record of C.1-anting permission to fill these <br /> a.rticula.r wetland ,,areas which are supposedly covered by the practice f reway. r .. <br /> Mr. UmIna. commented that the ditches are not natural- tributaries, <br /> ty., Reardon stated that 'they are wetlands. y <br /> Mrs _Umina stated that theplan_ a.s. ap roved in 1974 in which they showed'that- they. <br /> were doing to fill- certain parts of the wetlands. <br /> Atty. Reardon replied that the, Conservation. Commission indica.ted' to hia that they <br /> were not aware of the fact that he intended to fill the ditches by constructing the � <br /> practice fare;gay because it wasn't shown on Sheet 2 of, 2 with a, color code indicating � <br /> r,„1et1,,nd fill area., but it is shown on the color code as being a wetland. <br /> Mr. Umina asked if there was any. other way of building the practice area without f ill- <br /> ing those ditches? <br /> Atty. ea.rdon replied, tha.t that- would bring .us back to square .one as the-Conservation <br /> . Commission wants to talk about that. <br /> M. .' Umina, asked the Conservation Commission for- per~r�i ss i n build the fa.r way if � a: <br /> they agreed to only fill the'd itches. <br /> tty: Reardon stated that this issue was never addressed a nd- that the Conservation ,,''9-. <br /> om .iss ion's feels that he is COMP611ed to ask them.forermis �:on under the law by..' 4 <br /> way f filing a. Notice of Intent so that they mAy have ars opportu ity to- suggest toy. <br /> YOU that "yes” they-will 'l.et`you fill with conditions or n o" they won't let you : fill <br /> setting Forth the reasons why_ <br /> r. Umina presented the Commission with a letter from Donald oh ,' who was,-the Core <br /> servation, Commission's secretary back in 1974 and who s.i ned the' original Order of -+ ~ <br /> Conditions. <br /> = ; <br /> Pauline DeLor <br /> read the letter frog, Donald Hecht into the minutes (leiter was da.t d <br /> July 20, 198 <br /> At this oint a, le+ter from Paul R. Morse (former owner. of the area) was red into;- <br /> te minutes, <br /> Also, a. letter from Joseph Bergen, Aquatic iol ist of the Commonwealth of Ma. Divi <br /> of Fisheries and Wildlife,- a:s- real into the minutes. -: <br /> Mr. mina commented on the letter from Joseph Bw-genby referring to a. letter froM. <br /> Doctor Tal dated in 10,74- which states -that the golf colarse would have much less of <br /> an impa.ot on the river than 'the cranberry bogs did because the cranberry growers throw <br /> fertilizer right up to the river and a lot of it gets .in: At this point, 14r, U <br /> mina � <br /> . requested that. the letter from Dr. Teal be read <br /> Pauline DeLory road the letter from Dr. John Teal, an ecologist from North Falmouth, <br /> whih +gas F. d in . She eplad ht to o . rva.tior or:�r�isin called <br /> Teal in to do a. report as they did not feel that they had the expertise. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.