Laserfiche WebLink
i n erv-tlon }Cn,miss l Cin <br /> in utkQ_s of Jud. , Page 8 <br /> Mr. Bohnenberger commented that near the edge of Mr. Limina.#s property there is <br /> creek coming out around the edge of the cranberry bog with na.tura lring water <br /> lowing and full of duck weed. He also made mention 'of the fact that t1hlere were <br /> eleven ducks i there when h viewed the site* e commented how� the tro aft a <br /> their eggs' in the tributaries as they -are all sand. bottor� with a. heavy flow- of <br /> water. He stated that springs are natural andnoone carp create a spring.. <br /> Atty. ea.rdori commented that It was denied at the meeting two weeks ago. <br /> Mr. -ohne berger stated that according to DEQE whether they go through- a, man-made <br /> ditch' or a natural ditch, it is still a tributary'o At this point,- Mx. T ohne be ger <br /> referred to a dotted,line on the plan which is suppos ed to be the edge of the. wet. <br /> lands. He asked- Mr. Um' ina. if he remarked the area?. <br /> 'sir. - mina replied "yes"o <br /> Attyi, Reardon commented that the Conservation Commission should make a. decision on <br /> whether r not Sheet of 2 o the plan was Int t d;,t indicative of area, of <br /> wetland to be filled.; specifically, in talking in terms of the practice range, as <br /> opposed to Sheet 2 of 2, the color-coded plan. <br /> Mr. Bohnenberger asked if there was anything in the le4ger to indicate that. <br /> Atty,, . Reardon replied that there is nothing on Sheet 1 of. 2 to indicate that it is <br /> wetlands to be filled and Sheet 2 of 2 doesn't indic .te that area is going to be <br /> filled either. If- the Conservation- Commission finds that where that practice- fare- <br /> way <br /> ractice- fare-way is -located is, wetlands or was wetlands on the original plan submitted, then there <br /> is a violation l <br /> Mr. Bohnenberger.stated that he was there the other day and Mrs. e ory- observed it. <br /> } <br /> Atty-Reardon continued to say that if,- on the other hand., the Conservation. ommi s . n- - <br /> inds that that area was within the scope of their Order because of Sheet I.of 2-, the <br /> there is not a violation. He stated that it was the Commiss�.on`s ,fob determine it; <br /> r. Lopez referred to a. statoment Atty. Reardon made about the water c oming from the �. <br /> f e =into 'th ditches'-nd_,.t e -.going back into". the riv . ' <br /> Atty. Reardon stated that that was-wha.t Mr. Umina suggested two weeks ago <br /> Mr,, Lopez commented that he never heard that suggested. <br /> Atty. Reardon asked Mix. Um ina if he was correct and- did he. suggest its <br /> r. mina} replied: "yes, that is what 1 said". He made ref'erenc'e -to. Mr, Mors s:1.1 e ttor <br /> stating that h was the only expert that w have head.- from regarding an �y bogs, <br /> M r, - Lopez commented that inother words, he is tel in . s that water i .1. <br /> Mr. Benway commented that they put the boars in which dam u- the water. arra then the <br /> water backs up and rens through the ditches to flood the bog. <br /> Mr. Smith commented that the boards are not in the sluice -gays at this particular time <br /> { and that there i water flowing out of Mase ditches. <br />