My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/8/1982 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
9/8/1982 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2018 5:31:34 PM
Creation date
1/30/2018 2:40:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/08/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Conservation omr issio n _ <br /> r <br /> mi <br /> 2�, te - of September8', 1 .� - <br /> . l nn eeti cont# <br /> Attorney George Lebhertz, rear es ntzng Mr. do Mrs. Flynn, replied that a deed re- <br /> c:elVed from the Stable Trust datin ack to 1977 which was. recorded in gook 2603, <br /> page 313. He el .Ined that the Flynn 's-thought that -they. were obtairling the property <br /> th:a.t. ra. to the water and that they are paying taxes -on ,15, 1 s oar feet. e said <br /> that i the property were t e measu edv you would. come u with �. , � .rfeetof <br /> . 1and. He-, continued to say that nowhere in, any title reference do you e lot <br /> 14 and he contended that lot 44 was brought forth- Eby the town.• 'A e stated that an old <br /> rule which you would go 'y is that you-gain by accretion and lose by erosion.. He r n-= <br /> t i on ed that, he was also representing• butt rs to the F lyn 's pA.roperty, f4r. i'r �l <br /> jis relle. He stied if- the to ri could show hi .that any o;qners ever owned that 4Diec <br /> of property in 1 4 u sti n, as owner�s unknown means that somebody y ;gust o ��ad the fro�erty; <br /> Mrs. Flynn commented that when. -she was buyLng the -property in that a.r ea., she was consi- <br /> dering <br /> o si- <br /> erin the 1n.nd that the Misurelle's now own, as there were Four lots for sale. she <br /> ment ned that sheas-ked who Weed the land in front -of t "e ?4i ure-I'.e roi?erty and was <br /> told that Amelia. filler o,,ined the marsh on. the corner lot. She co amented that she pur- <br /> chased and 503 From Stable Trust and that the land F a Yie er di-vi ed. <br /> r tto'r ey George Lebhertz commented h t the two -lots th .t MirS. Flynn pur hased were <br /> lots 42 and 42A and that if ;you add the two- together, you should come up with 15 o OOO- <br /> sq a.re Feet of land. <br /> • • <br /> _attorney e-i.r on commented that the real question was how the assessing map came t <br /> .ti <br /> show -ja,rce,1 44. <br /> i <br /> Ears. ply -c ted tea.t not .f l the assessor m showed that parcel; ,bust the 1974 <br /> ..nd 1975 ma.Ds showed it. <br /> Attorney Lebhertz. started that ihIs opinion was that the assessorse a-?.- ted the marsh <br /> land as being a. lot, and that he did not think they would find in the records a, lot 44 <br /> as such. <br /> ?"} t r *r? �". ,, ��'.E '� l o'' r r. h')w the -B r� i r����:e s + �.� � ��"cam,. e <br /> the ria. r-I.s a lot - d won rec i`` it Tire re y virtue Of what `Ir, �:� ry e mer::?in d, w en <br /> ne prepared it --'o the .own. H e c o m mented that he would ]. 1 quire w?tr: Bob EIdrCage who <br /> oo over O r'y s }- s to check -i n" old records. <br /> .fit k ,!_i1 4 1 �.+I.: .7 ✓ � 53x�J he C r e f 1.+ *f l wi V -L '!`�-v ::S' ''44 �: a i h �om between <br /> rr +r a a 4 <br /> ' ] r �`, k. ?i"� marI }• t i�.7 iA t' Y� E el-2-��� "i as �k�����'1 � #' -le said ��C� ,�1- s� � <br /> t1he town would e hard-pressed to f ind that there ..f ere any other oil ers, <br /> w <br /> .r "c l' Lrd o c,. ' i, ? there ;:� r-t thin to .-n ic?to a It :. �' a u r <br /> ?,ne r'e'p ery n t?o , etc,, sc as not 't ave --`. e l „nC� a,���l ��, �ed9 <br /> ttornev Lebhertz ,stated that he did a run down on the. pro erty an There was o th'�ng tc <br /> :d c ..t anything ! ror t o F. �t re: t r* e so s a.ted ._at <br /> y +� were the case, <br /> f couldn't't u d r tf nd ? the town wou� , when t,--' e it r t e rt r stated ted that <br /> the deeds .f erring to the plan do not say one w�Jy or the other- and it does not say to i <br /> lot 14 which you would think it would scay , in fact, there was a lot 44 in enc-is tencer <br /> He felt that lot .44 only cores up through the assessor's off ice. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.