Laserfiche WebLink
MS <br /> 'y Cons �r t r Co��sslo k - '- <br /> � ti <br /> _ of. <br /> y.� if3' #fes '1982 <br /> {i! /■L .y ... ',i• } -f 41 r <br /> ' �.rt •' fir� ,�w {' �4. ir ' • _ + ; ' 4 T1 '{• , .'rte 6 a Z'i ..T 7 <br /> m , . ,. Page.; .2- <br /> .i. • �_..., {: `9 '�'._. ,.Jam* - • # }:`.� 4 �, 4 Y - _ `+ •T La -+ 'w- •.� - ' r,' <br /> Richard ''bubin Hea ori , coni <br /> Dorothy asked how. th'e' column 'wbuld be dug?- <br /> mr. .Warwick replied that their. wo ld be -hand dugged,, <br /> . Charlie asked er if the finished:'- contour would be the am e <br /> _ <br /> r <br /> Mr, Warwi ' 'replied 'that- the-- ra' would be nil-._ . =F <br /> Dorothy told Mr, Warwick that the Commission would take it und. r advise- <br /> ment and that an Order of Conditio.ns would e prepared, <br /> . . Hearing _ <br /> h <br /> y+n i William <br /> iY ni Y i 5, 1 Little Neck Lane,, *',, atepee '`S <br /> Mr. <br /> Chairperson Studley read the public arnotice. -�_�toostr ' <br /> o t - , <br /> �maintai n a 't ' e- r4 <br /> e oor �dwe�.la n wit .:r at decks �' patio. ar:i .. <br /> ea r* <br /> , and , ' � " .* thin 100 feet c r 8 <br /> { _ <br /> -.. <br /> � Tn- <br /> -Warwick, <br /> +�y *k;��lY [y��� �yw�+ `Y 7nf rye, /yam they- <br /> /.r� <br /> CO <br /> are . tin 'or- a <br /> waiver- +r„f,"the-,.' <br /> sewage d s osa . tem ro ' t o Board o eal w i o � they 'w 11 'issue review by the ons ra io ro ml i-o . ..: <br /> .: <br /> a.- _ <br /> fir'* <br /> Warwick: showed 'the C o-m 'is io c 'aw L s Fr- r � the, arch' ' <br /> # -•.. � � ' ems' }; <br /> tiox -ithat --t e:. aserr-erg ' is..'a. -o le as it 'takes o' face off# a ,bank. <br /> He said'. .that' hay -L his- in-ion., 1, • ro d. not hurt the.' 1� � <br /> � y. <br /> _-- of`-.thee' 1� nk- <br /> o e to e t 'the 2 -foot e e� a t i r�, ar s 41 i <br /> Recommendations were ` iew y_TtCommission from the . TTheir,- con .' <br /> cerns -are with isno�e i r�tx .ar tealope rrerentd. <br /> They ask if the location of the dv7elling would effect the stability of the l <br /> coastal bank* And they suggestion that Coastal Wti s Rer la ion ' 3o_ <br /> reviewed <br /> r. e � that s that t <br /> wa,rw� commented e. � s�ta ���t�� �� the �ir� I_t.-'��. _• <br /> eote ate.r oorstot' '-`�' � ' ! . .won <br /> � <br /> ion- mentioning than might e during'__ .o st c- .- <br /> ion' . . said that ' a backhoe.. should work from-. the 'street -side -and , could: ._ - <br /> acre l,, He said that the project � supervised Ta o � t. <br /> Ir. Wanqick also mentioned that 'here was sore '.concern with the <br /> leotrioaL. <br /> a er t., ' <br /> O 'further questions were askew. . <br /> mow•�■r#�� , - _ . ' <br /> tter from Attorney Reardon -, .-,re: Flynn matter- <br /> letter <br /> at er etter dated December2.1,. ' 1982.-was � lew ' ba the issi <br /> eao _ - _ _� _ o o Attorney <br /> * r g�a r ding ',the.'.- EleanorFlynnratter' Inn..his' o i-ni � i - h act?W . <br /> inis'trative agency and. does.. riot have the _ne -a r r power to' .. make 'a�' t min- <br /> tion on ownership o ' .hand. He . recommendod that the onservati - omm'fission <br /> it raw their appeal to I Q . <br />