Laserfiche WebLink
Informational Meeting <br /> September 30, 1986 <br /> Page 2. <br /> G. Mc . : Usually someone proposing work in a wetland area is the applicant under <br /> the act. It cou 1 d be a developer or homeowner. Half the time the applicant does <br /> not own the land. <br /> It was agreed the term applicant should be used. <br /> Q. Earle a rs to r s: 3. 1 - In addition to other things, it includes reference to rec- <br /> reation <br /> ec- <br /> reation and aesthetics. I wonder if you could explain that. Does it mean if the <br /> area was used for recreation before that you might try to prevent it from being <br /> used for anything else? Whose aesthetics, the property owner or someone else <br /> A. G. Mc i. : The recreational value of Wetlands and related water resources Is pro- <br /> tected by the bylaw and the aesthetic values not as reasons to regulate wetlands <br /> work standi <br />