Laserfiche WebLink
Informational Meeting <br /> September 30, - 1986 <br /> Page 7. <br /> Q. El l i Laycock: Under Jurisdiction, you have not dealt with Barrier Beach ou t- <br /> right. <br /> A. . c0: it says beach which most Commissions have in the bylaws to cover all <br /> kinds of beaches, freshwater and barrier. This could be specified in the bylaw <br /> or regulations. <br /> Q. P. Fan to i : In terms of the overall impact of th i . section, except for the add- <br /> ition <br /> dd-ition of the 100 feet in any land subject to flooding, it has been ray experience <br /> with the Ma s hpee Conservation Commission that if, in fact, although i t is a dis- <br /> cretionary <br /> i -retionar power within the buffer zone, that the Board has fairly consistently <br /> ruled the buffer zone to be significant and required a notice of intent t be <br /> filed. My question E s, in the real world,, except for that one addition, how <br /> .. does this differ from what was practiced? I am asking the policy of the Commission <br /> r. <br /> itself. <br /> A, L. Beh.rman.: ,Thr i - i s. our obligation under State law and is handled on a case b <br /> case situation. <br /> Bar ter A-3.4: This fee i s i n addition to that required by the Wetlands <br /> Protection Act..,, Does that mean you might ruin two separ-ate hearings? Would you <br /> charge two .separate fees and duplicate the- process or Would you attempt to bring <br /> there both together? <br /> 4 <br /> - Y ' <br /> A. As a matter of practicality, if at all possible, we are far too busy to have two <br /> hearings instead of 'one covering the job. We have a state mandated timetable <br /> which n other Board in town has. L. Beh rma n <br /> Q. B. J.Thomas: Wi.th the present town bylaw, do you hold both at the same time? <br /> A. L. B hrman: Yes, whenever possible. <br /> Q. E. a rs to rs: 4.3.5: Notice and hearings, abutters to be notified including <br /> across a boder of water. flow do you def i ne th is? <br /> A. iorentini : I asked this question in, I believe the Assessor 's office, <br /> and was told you take your <br /> -property and with a compass scribe a circle from <br /> all the farthest corners and all within 300 feet is the abutters you, must <br /> notify. This should be made clear. <br /> L. Behrman: This is the premise we have been working with. <br /> Q. P. Fan to i : Copies may be obtained by abutters free of charge, does that mean <br /> that an abutter so notified on a project warts his or her own copy and that the <br /> applicant is liable to providing to him or her a complete copy? <br /> L. Behrman; I have had some questions on this myself. There should be a more <br /> precise definition. <br /> John S1a ins y: 4.3. 5. There should be a time limit and not give the Commission <br /> permission to continue indefinitely. <br /> L. Beh rma n: In the past, whenever able to specify a date we can continue the <br /> hearing to, we have been happy to do so. <br />