Laserfiche WebLink
[ F <br /> ashpee Conservation Commission <br /> Meeting 1 , 19$6 <br /> Page 2. <br /> John Va rkonda stated i n working with the Commission and trying to help r. Govoni . <br /> he feels what has happened i s a case of Mr. Mirliss getting in over his head . <br /> violation did take place and the Commission did stop it. He suggested that at <br /> this point, the project should go ahead i n order to rectify the situation. The <br /> damage has been done. <br /> Mr. Govoni asked if the Commission ' s concern was for dirt getting into the pond. <br /> Ms Behrman stated the commission is concerned with the total impact of the project <br /> and the impact of the building . The Commission has been presented with aN fait <br /> accompli , which makes it difficult for everyone. <br /> Mr. Govon i advised the septic is to code and there wi 1 1 not be any digging of <br /> any depth in the f ron t. If it were dug to the original plans, i t would have <br /> required an eight foot trench all around in order to get -four feet below grade <br /> for the wa l 1 s and another foot for the footings . <br /> Mr. i r l i s advised he was notified tonight b Mr . Van To] that he will have <br /> less lawn than before. Mrs. Ferriday asked Mr. Ilan Tol if requested to remove <br /> the law,, rou 1 d it be possible. he agreed it would be from a design standpoint, <br /> but that it would be an owner-Commission decision. <br /> Ms Beh rma n questioned the excavation necessary to tie in with the plumbing i n <br /> the ground . r. Gov i n i advised the edge of the deck is at grade level and going <br /> back into the hill a trencher wi 1 1 be used to flind the pipe and reconnect. The <br /> sewerage pipe is plugged and there will be no problem finding it. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg questioned a dotted line stating existing foundation. He was <br /> advised the foundation was a cantilevered block foundation. <br /> Mr. Gooni agreed to provide a footprint for purposes of clarity and future <br /> on-sates. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated the plans on file with the Commission and D EE do not show <br /> the house as it is going to be. New plans shou1d be provided to both. Mr . <br /> Govon i agreed . he asked if the footings could be pint in immediately before <br /> a hard freeze. <br /> Mr. VanTo l offered to take ,back the landscape plans and resubmit them to show <br /> the old and new with actual measurements documented . <br /> Mrs . Ferriday suggested the first thing to be done is to move the dirt and <br /> put down hay bales . <br /> After discussion, the commission agreed to allow the footings to be put in. <br /> A footprint -was requested with two copies sent to DEE. A file number rust <br /> be received from DE E. When plans are received, the hearing wi l 1 be considered <br /> closed and an order of Conditions will be issued within 21 days . once issued, <br /> there is a 10 day appeal period. The order is then filled with the deed with <br /> Certification to the Commission. Mr. Goyon i was advised the project could then <br /> proceed. -ale asked if in the interim, once the documents are provided with proof <br /> they were sent to D EE, could they put in the foundation walls . <br /> Ms Beh rman s to ted that is part of the construction and legally , t-jor k cannot <br />