Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> of December 1� � �` '•�L <br /> t1''"�w - <br /> kr a. <br /> The fol-1ow in members of the r d o Conservation o rss to er s w r�r--. <br /> JV e s;7 nt at 4u-hA-�.► meeting: Dorothy ►.."• dley ,, Chairman; �rlv l DarC.J.;71nc , <br /> Vice �"i��ir�1 n; :. ; .� . ... tu< rt Fe o nie31 i of Rosenberg: <br /> Wayne Tavares and3. e 7: , Thomas . Douglas Boyd w a s present i Y1 Own <br /> advisory ca acity. <br /> Chairman Studley stated that David Rearm, attorney 'or John �Owers , as <br /> requested a Certificate of Compliance for workperformed 29 Fells <br /> Pond ;:4 . Boyd has iris cted the project and states that work <br /> co oleted is in compliance with the order of Conditions and has been <br /> completed satisfactorily. The Certificate of Comoliance was sig ed <br /> by all members present and will e issued . <br /> letter has been received fro Robert A. Era a'1, PE, agent for <br /> John F, O' Neill, requesting modifications to the OrderofConditions <br /> issued for Project S ELI -- 'yd o e WI� t ��1 5 =, i#,F a r~l i �.�re North . <br /> After.. _ t i ori duly made and seconded , S ecial Conditions r' and rfg vie re <br /> amended as requested and the amended order of Conditions will be issued <br /> Public heari W ; held re Zardi - the <br /> jliction of Ralph Rose nor <br /> work intended to be performed at ,1149 Spoondrift 'a`M a , Project �-r3 9 <br /> This application is to construct and maintain an addition, attached <br /> deck and gazebo onto an existingdwelling within loot of op o �esset <br /> -4. <br /> Creek . .NM. .`J. ",'Iwic o . , Inc. is agent for the applicant . <br /> ## • 'i'k i 1 l i es 71, 4 ,%;i c was present at the hearing and submitted pis <br /> for this project . <br /> Chairman Studley noted that t :..;EQ77 has recominerded that the proposed <br /> concrete retaining wall and gazebo may cause instability of the bark <br /> and it is suggested that these be removed off of the Face of the bank . <br /> Mr . ttl a i k said that he has discussed the matter of the wall with the <br /> applicant pointing out that '''there is nothing to retain'' . In regard to <br /> the gazebo , it 'cold be put in hand-placed sonotubes on the bark which <br /> PJr . Warwick s aid probably has more impact than the wall. According <br /> to I;i . ila is , 1,1 . Rose has agreed to remove the whole structure ', <br /> The gazebo can be mored back to become part of the proposed deck . <br /> Mrs . Studley ascertained that , at this time , nothing has actually been <br /> f <br /> i <br /> 7 <br />