Laserfiche WebLink
arias h pe e Conservation C i sion <br /> Meeting of December 1 , 1984 <br /> Page Three <br /> lowered, it will be closer to ground water and could create pollution <br /> problems . " <br /> Chairman Studley called for further questions , comments or discussion. <br /> As there were none , she stated that the matter wouldbe taken under <br /> advisement . <br /> The application of New Seabury Corporate-on to emplace 5._10 cubic <br /> yards of compatible fill material along the beach-dune-bank in-'Ger- <br /> face <br /> nG -Face twice a year, actual amount being adjusted to need, present <br /> designated access routes to be used and maintained as necessary for <br /> the duration of the Project at Maushop was continued, after motion <br /> duly rude and seconded, at the request of the Petitioner' s Agent, <br /> BSC Cape Cod survey Consultants . This continued hearing will be <br /> held on January 10 , 1985 at 8;oo P. m. <br /> At this time , the matter of Project #SE43-305 of ari l y _and Joseph <br /> Benoit regarding the Cottage #25 at r aushop village was discussed, <br /> specifically the Order of Conditions issued which is in dim by <br /> -- the parties - the parties being the M h eConservation ' ' <br /> a pe <br /> a issuing authority and Mr. and Mrs . Benoit as owners of the property <br /> and the Petitioners , <br /> Mrs . Studley said that she had attended the on-site inspection con- <br /> ducted by DEQE . At that time , she did discuss the utter with John <br /> Blundo of DEQR who suggested that it would be to the best interest of <br /> the parties if agreement could be expedit-iously negotiated, <br /> At tonight' s meeting, Peggy Collins of BSC Cape Cod Survey Consultants <br /> and Kevin Kirrance , Esq. , counsel for the Petitioners , were present . <br /> After recognition by the Chairperson, Ms . col fins deferred to attorney <br /> Kirrane who briefly reviewed the entire situation. Attorney Kirrane <br /> then requested that the Board consider amending the original Order of- <br /> Conditions , <br /> fConditions , specially, Special Condition #2 and to make reference t <br /> architectural drawings and revised plans submitted and other infor- <br /> ation supplied with recent filings <br /> B. Jean Thomas asked that it �be recorded that , "I feel that the <br /> Commission was correct in the prior decisions on this matter) and <br /> that we did have jurisdiction according to 10 .2 c, d Wetlands Act , " <br /> She further said that it was important that this be recorded that the <br />