Laserfiche WebLink
Mashpee ons rva-t i on Commission <br /> Meeting of January 10, 1985 <br /> Page Four <br /> in the precpnt geological formations would have no adverse impac <br /> on w ildl ife . *' have no indication of any shellfs h that would be <br /> adversely affected y this . .r inali , ie think t on he aesthetic <br /> O d the Bylaw would come down clearly in favor of what v',r� wanto <br /> do which is preserve the appearance of the stretch of beach as it is <br /> and protect the bluff. We have identified in our research the sections <br /> of the regulations under the ,%- l antis -,ro t e c ion Act that -i,-;e think <br /> are i ��ac e d y thisproject , that in mind, ' d i e o burn <br /> he uresentationover to MS-D . Collins , one other ing I' d like to <br /> point out is we do have some photographs which show the condition of <br /> the Maushop site in 1983 prior to us beginning the nourishment program <br /> and using that a.c e s s . ha. ho .rah Nrr.. S uc c i indicating00 . <br /> does show washed-out ed-out bluff leading dov n from Maushop Heights , What <br /> we have., done. is we have Put loam on that and seeded it a ' attempted <br /> o control the erosion which is one of the requirements of the <br /> aDpropriat%e. regulations . The "ClamshellRoad" itself always existed . <br /> The only thing that is different there: nov is that we have added a <br /> clamshell surface . We think ;that clamshells are an a.p ro- r , e s r— <br /> face material to be used on a road near she beach. Vite fail to see <br /> y adverse environmcentai impact the use of that road. have <br /> had onvers a pions la ith the engineer 10rom Lakeville wh has been dov.Fn. <br /> o the site a.nd that engineer has askedhoa t ���e take some steps t <br /> s tom the ugiaocc --%1'1 -� 01_1 s� e r':� d 10-Mould h-_ave <br /> 1 one11 .. - t. Ls--Ls-- <br /> !7•+ r-L -. � �J �l ... YJ J* ��.�. ~►fir'..r r ti.L -0 6..+1 L_; 4J :rh r... �4�r Lti `� l 1 1 r S. `r.J r• �•'+ <br /> . L..kr+. .1" <br /> t- \_' `i�� ;.+t 'k ; r� + •1YY�1 i ��� �1���,'� � '�{�� 1�'r #�r �.1 �� + r• r �+ � F� 1 <br /> �� i ki .� • .4... -- w: 1.r �� Lair.., ...- ITa� f 11 a r �+ �1 •'` %! �IiJ .�,. I.. - '..-+ •u kJ trk <br /> # [` �`' �_ '"° ' '-Y+{'•i r--_- �3.'•� �; � ;-r3 ... , "�' � L�r �j�� *t +' +��+A i~ + � ' <br /> #� 4J 1-�wr r.J L_ � .. .kms. :J . f «. -.. � {..,t � tJ �+ ,t. .. + '+ ,. . � 1i +.+ 1 7J V� ti �,.� <br /> If <br /> ',� - ' ] -t_ =..y ' .7 _ '` 1 <br /> LA_ <br /> C.ti.i .i 4ti �]� f� ,�. ��:CJ <br /> •, ' ,-� ` .-.;J + -F � -.I" '..� r"'•"+* �: .' a "' ..- "^ti�,-... . � . , .�-'- �±•--. _ ;. - <br /> LJ <br /> a 3" a <br /> ��w Mx <br /> from M. I"i e have c ies for you, I believe and from .%'a er `.:Iilu pion <br /> Control . Today, on she ' Phone , I recelvd verbal al onf irmat ion that <br /> E '� a erw �,ys also says that there is no filing necessary and that <br /> will be confirmed in writing to you and to us within the Vy o e i The <br /> only agency that has not responded to our inquiry in writ ins at this <br /> point is l I talked 14'i h Dave e a ds on about and he said <br /> that he was going to confirm with Elizabeth Cole-Harris and John <br /> Blundo, w;*ho a?�e our l c-1 �� � �: . , i���.1 the rog�'a � - s all r� i�t <br /> �qi h tliem. I.e did not anticipate e a ro i a.ms with the diff ions <br /> that i e are proposing. ' <br /> ''4li- h that in mind , I virould just life to point out or highlight for <br /> You the differences in the l ding o ?ig� `t . The difference, in the <br /> ill l <br /> o i d L not in h, quantity o' sand tea 1 is going to dumped <br /> or the area of coastline in which this activity w+rillak e place . It' s <br /> simply a reduction in the number of accesses o ' those points . Pre- <br /> viously, were filed for Five accesses . This time we are -4 ding for four, <br /> the access h has been omitted ref eren d ate 431e access ,o site <br />