My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/19/1985 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
12/19/1985 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2018 5:08:53 PM
Creation date
2/16/2018 2:47:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/19/1985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a.shpe e Conservation Commission <br /> Executive Session re : litigation between the Commission and <br /> New abur� Corporation <br /> e.cember ��, �� � <br /> 'age Eleven <br /> The other thing is he says that we can write it in an Order <br /> that they can use the clamp shell road as an access and if a. <br /> court decides otherii`:e , then that part of the order goes out <br /> the v-i dow. But we don' t want to issue a. final order of condi- <br /> tions for an access point that may not be able to be used. S o, i <br /> • <br /> Mr. McGregor: "If you give on the access point. if you give <br /> flexibility you may Further your goals to get a better beach <br /> nourishment program,, R� <br /> Mr. x o enbergs "I think you might from what I heard at the pre- <br /> ad u c i a.t o ry hearing. If we could come up with what we thought <br /> was a proper beach nourishment program and then use the acres <br /> road situation as trade , 1 think we would have a, tremendous . . . <br /> and a certificate of compliance on the previous order to which <br /> Barry Fogel attached a great deal of importance , with those two <br /> r- points we have a very substantial leverage , I think. For negotiation,,--,., ,, <br /> But we have to ha , in ray pinion, . . 11 <br /> Ms ,, du ont: "We' re not in favor beach nourishment, -we're in <br /> favor o bankFtabilia.tion. Those terms have been used inter-- <br /> changeably and suddenly caught on. Beach noui-Shent ic., something <br /> that i a.e��thetic . 7.e're taming about bank tabili a. .on,t� <br /> Mr. Iur phrio�, ; "That' s wrong. Beach nourlch ent . . As essential to <br /> bank ota.bzli tion. You'll never get bank stabilization without it <br /> L. . du-Pont: Vle agree with you. What they want to do and what we <br /> would like thcm to do are two different things . . . '11 <br /> Mr. Rosenberg. "'V-,hat I ju-Ft said is if we get a proper beach <br /> nouri:�hment Drogram, . . i you v ant to call if nourishment ent plus <br /> Atabili zation or whatever. . . if we have a. proper program that can <br /> be defended a- the right viay to go with it and then instead o this <br /> compl. tell inadequate prograns they propose ,, then we have some <br /> leverage to try to get that program 'in exchange . " <br /> Ms ,, du 'ont: ""When they comae in for Emergency Orders , they're <br /> allay asking for an emergency to do beach nourishment and we c ay <br /> 'no, you want an emergency order to do bank stabilization. I think <br /> we have to bring thi� t� a l e, " <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.