Laserfiche WebLink
Mash �--_ e Comervation Co f�:sion <br /> Ex <br /> e c ut iveSession re : l zt .gat i on b e t�(e en the Commission and <br /> New S ebur' Corporation <br /> December 19, 1985 <br /> Page Three <br /> muted a. list of facts that I used in drawing some other con- <br /> clusions <br /> on-..lusions that we may want to address a little bit further. " <br /> Mr. Shea: "The factual basis of what we are stating is that the <br /> break in the bank down at the beach existed since the 1940' s and <br /> it was e 7 paraded and contracted over time , that the construction <br /> of the clam shell road ��while it was in the buffer zone area �a.snl t <br /> directly in the resource area and there may have been some widening <br /> of the access point when the clam shell road was constructed ." <br /> Chairman duPont : "There is a very serious problem here . You are <br /> saying in your k ummar , ' access to the beach from Maushop village <br /> "here was never access to the beach from Tkaushop Vile age . That <br /> access belongs to another association which is Rock Landing Park <br /> Association. What you have seen as a footpath was never a foot- <br /> path that belongs to New Sea.bury or Maushop Village . That foot- <br /> path belongs to a private neighborhood which is Rock Landing Park <br /> ssoci ation In your summary here you say access to the beach <br /> from Ta.usop village has existed. . .there was never any access t <br /> { the beach from Mausop Village , That access is privately owned <br /> by Rock L2nding Park Association. What New veabury chid was t <br /> make theins lv s a clam shell road adjacent to the footpath that <br /> belongs to private property. That is not New S eabury owned <br /> property where you have pictures that go back to the forties <br /> So , Nf w Seabury Corporation and the �+ a.ushop lig+. e section of <br /> W e a.b 'ry never had access to the roe ach. . . or to a. footpath or <br /> anything else . 11 <br /> Mr. Humphries : ' gal ramifications according to ownership that <br /> iF wh .re this analyris is not helpful , r, <br /> Ks du P, nt: "This an-,Iys is does not re re ent our concern, w' th <br /> Ne n abury Corporation be c aur e it is Seabury Corporati-on th a b <br /> has violated the wetlands by making them elves a road to get an <br /> ac c e to the beach. They never had an access to the beach and <br /> they were denied access by thr, owners of that foot a th. he dust <br /> decided they �ier going to have access and made themselves es a road, " <br /> Mr. Humphries : "Is the access point of their road the same point . . . <br /> Ms , Du-Ponta. "No . It runs adjacent to it and parallel to it . It <br /> does not begin at the sane Doint , It ends at the same point ; but it <br />