My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/13/1987 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
8/13/1987 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2018 5:12:11 PM
Creation date
2/16/2018 3:03:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/13/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
' 4 <br /> Mashpee Conservation Commission <br /> Meeting of August 13 1987 <br /> Page 7 . <br /> Mary R. Brown Order of Conditions issued, <br /> New Seabury Corp. - Negative Determination issued. <br /> New Seabury Corp. - Positive Deterr nation issued. <br /> avid Harrington: John advised Mr. Harrington has ignored the Comm- <br /> ission <br /> o - <br /> ssion continually. The project began one year ago and he was. re- <br /> quested to filep which he did in January,, six months later. ' ' ,. <br /> Mrs. Jacobson stated -it was her understanding this was to be denied, <br /> After an Enforcement order, the stairs were put in. <br /> : .. - <br /> John suggested denying at the state level on the effects to *an 'inland <br /> bank and no decision on the bylawIk <br /> Mrs, Mars tern suggested referring to Town Counsel to have malty <br /> assessed as the enforcement order was issued and he continued. ..to <br /> violate, <br /> It was noted the revised plans requested by the Corgi s son were dated <br /> May and received mid�June. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg asked if the hearing was still open and John adv ,sed ' t <br /> was cont .n ed indefinitely as totally inaccurate plans were 'c t n: <br /> ually tted, <br /> +ir . goo .advised that as recently as July 3 he added sets of <br /> stairs. <br /> r., Rosen-berg suggested if the Commission is going to deny,, then e- <br /> mawal should be ordered. <br /> Mrs, gars tees ,cues- the effect on the sank if r eval was ordered. <br /> If - this '_does Mo t the environment, in her opinion,, takes It out <br /> will. John agreed. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated, under some cases, if they built it withoutper- <br /> mission then the Marden of proof shifts to the Com sion to prove <br /> that what they- did has been a derogation of interests protected sunder <br /> the act, <br /> Mrs. Jacobson stated there was no reason, other than aesthetics-? -for <br /> it to have been created in the first place. Mrs. Marsters stated <br /> hi3 is an okay reason as long as they do not harm the' environment. <br /> She suggested the hearing be -left open. <br /> John stated, in that light, t looks horrible from the water,, but. for <br /> averall impact, it has none, He asked who issued the enforcement order <br /> as !"_emmp did not. <br /> Mrs. Jacobson stated she was under the impression one was issued and <br /> if not, it shout.d have been. She stated she asked many times, Until <br /> July 3 , Mr. Darrington had no access and thea put in the stairs, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.