Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> conserti"on. <br /> m i s ion <br /> Meeting o-f Fbr -r' ,, .2 -.-19 <br /> Page 3 <br /> 8 : 00 <br /> - harl R. Talanian (Ho 1M'e s & McGrath) Lo-t 9 OckwayBav Rd. <br /> Continued from 1/21/88. Tod Palmet i er p.resent'ing. 6 Board- of Appeals <br /> permit not re.oeived. <br /> The Commission was advised Lisa reported the Board of Appeals did <br /> listen to : her presentat'I on. ..The db' � ori inal.l r was going in over,., an <br /> unstab-le section f 'the _bank',', Ir, Palm. t i - met with- Lisa and it was <br /> -moved 20 feet :down to a -lower .sp-ot to minimize v i ori disturbed. <br /> The brick patio was 4--Abk = <br /> - . . fee-t- and-. up approximately20 <br /> � eet. A bead-.- but �in 'die pier* A brisk alk a r mill conn t the <br /> patio t'o the pier . One change is that piles will be 10 inches instead <br /> of 4 X 4 posts. There will be no d9i sturbance of the salt marsh and <br /> there are plans to bring in heavy equipment. <br /> Ms Burman requested a revised Notice of Intent detailing this. <br /> Concerning spain , Mr . Palmetier stated they are proposing 2 X 1 " <br /> with one inch spacing. <br /> HEARING- CONTINUED PENDING BOARD OF APPEAL DECISION. IF NO FURTHER <br /> THE <br /> CHANGES, HEARING TO BE CONSIDERED CLOSED. <br /> 8: 15 David Parsons All Cape Survey) 297 Hoophole Rd. Continued from <br /> 2/4/88, Mr . Parsons presenting. New plans were teviewed . Registrar re- <br /> eipt was noted. <br /> Mr. Parsons stated the erosion has been caused by the high water. <br /> Ms Behrman stated being on the side of the ice flog, with this <br /> structure, the ice will be shunted to the side creating a worse sit- <br /> uation. <br /> it- <br /> uation. <br /> K x. Parsons stated there are currently 15 walls on the pond like this <br /> and it does not seem to b6 a problem. <br /> Mrs , .Jacobson stated they are not walls like this, they are back some. <br /> Mr. Parsons stated they could more it back . <br /> -Ms Beran questioned the meaninS of Low Dater Mark and stated it <br /> should be clarified on the plan . Also , there is no elevation on the <br /> plan . _ <br /> Mark Howland o'f Environmental Research,h, representatiire of Mr. Parsons, <br /> arrived, ,- <br /> Ms <br /> rived. ,-Ms Be rman stated -Johns Pond - elevation is listed as 38' , there is a <br /> high water; mark , e i st ig water marls and low water mark ; what are they <br /> in terms of elevations? <br /> Mr . Howland stated the low water mark would have been a mark taken at <br /> non-site visit; high water mark would be the same. They we're <br /> observed. It 6 is a town regulated pond, controlled by dams. The elev <br /> ati n of the pond fluctuates according to whatever the torn decides . <br />